the deaths of henri paul, princess diana and dodi al fayed

1.Mohammed Al Fayed is not an objective judge of Britain, British institutions or the British public.
2. The British Secret Service is believed by many of us to behave with a modicum of integrity. Nonetheless the possibility of a rogue element, or a dysfunctionally corrupt element achieving preeminence within the organisation is not hard to imagine. (In my opinion the Irish police force, a far more provincial body, has become institutionally, individually and congenitally corrupt, merely by virtue of the fact that its actions are not properly scrutinised. A dysfunction within a more high octane power driven organisation such as British Intelligence would produce exponentially greater outrages against the innocent than the habitual thuggery of Irish police. An even better analogy would perhaps be the behaviour in America of Ollie North and his cadre within the Reagan administration during the 1980s.) By rogue or dysfunctionally corrupt, I mean capable of murder. Quis custodet custodes? Who guards the guardians? We do. And the price of our liberty is eternal vigilance.
3. The absence of any functioning speed cameras or security cameras on the route Dodi and Diana were driven by Henri Paul through Paris from the restaurant to their deaths, seems improbable.
4. The death, supposedly by suicide, of the driver of a white car which some believe collided with Dodi and Diana's car, is disquieting.
5. The theft of a laptop computer belonging to the man who conducted the enquiry into Diana's death, Lord Stevens, (a theft that took place during the course of his enquiry) is disquieting.
6. The citing of a lady friend of Diana's as being in a position to refute the suggestion Diana was pregnant is dissatisfying. In my opinion this lady does not speak like a friend of Diana's. Pure instinct. But of all the points I make, this is the one I am most sure of.
7. The Stevens Report does not resolve the issues.