the trouble with uighurs

Watching the rather surrealistic reportage on the news channels of this week's Al Qaeda uprising in north western China. Most of the satelite news channels are in a state of denial about what is going on. We are told the riots involve members of the oppressed Uighur Muslim ethnic minority who our gullible newsmen insist are merely attempting to assert their rights in the face of Chinese repression. I do not agree with this analysis. I am loathe to judge any people harshly who have been compelled to live under a communist dictatorship. But the Uighurs are not an oppressed people. Here is the news. The Uighurs are Al Qaeda. And over the course of the last few days none of the satelite television channels, and almost none of our liberal left decayed obsolete declining ceasing to exist newspapers, almost none of em I say, have deigned to so much as mention Al Qaeda in their coverage of the situation. Most hilariously, Al Jazeera, the Nazi channel managed to report on the Uighur violence tonight without even once mentioning Muslims. The gorgeous Ghida Fakhry Nazi who presents the flagship news programme for Al Jazeera was questioning the station's on the spot China reporter the delectable Melissa Chan. "What has brought these tensions to the fore?" wondered Ghida Fakhry adorably. "I can't hear you," answered Melissa Chan. Seriously though they're doing a wonderful job. You've got to feel sorry for Al Jazeera. They're anxious not to offend the Chinese because many Arab Muslim Nazis regard China as a useful tool for distracting the United States of America and the free world. China is playing a key role in propping up the Arab murderocracy in Sudan at the moment. Without China, that particular Al Qaeda affiliate in Sudan could no longer exist. So Al Jazeera, normally so partisan in favour of Al Qaeda terrorists, whom it still insists on referring to rather quaintly as "fighters," has positively dithered in its coverage of the Uighurs. Poor old Al Jazeera can't make up its mind whether the Nazis can afford yet another superpower enemy. Al Qaeda itself is in no doubt. Al Qaeda has always shown a certain disinclination to play the long game. Truly it is at war with everybody. Even with those idiot countries (Communist China and Putin's Russia) who it uses occasionally as allies to disrupt American interests in various regional conflicts. Thus after Nine Eleven, rather than just playing smart and focussing on riding out the American backlash, the Muslim Al Qaeda psycho Nazis opened up other fronts all over the planet earth, bombing schools and theatres in Russia, murdering policemen in China, launching a wave of intercommunal blood letting in the Philippines and Thailand, and carrying out massive bombings across the Muslim world, particularly in Indonesia and Pakistan. All this while blowing up trains and buses in England and Spain, murdering a Prime Minister and a film director in the Netherlands, attempting to poison the water supply in Rome, slaughtering an Irish teenager on Grafton Street Dublin, and torching French cities nightly for the sheer hell of it. No one has ever accused Al Qaeda of being logical. Yet as long as CNN, Sky News, ABC, CBS, NBC, the BBC, Channel Four, Newsweek, Time Magazine et al (particularly Al, I hate him) as long as these appeasing shites continue to turn a blind eye to what Al Qaeda is doing, as long as the reporters of the free world continue to seek ways to interpret each new terrorist outrage as resulting from localised conditions and nothing to do with the broader Al Qaeda conspiracy against the world, as long as our half witted media group shills play the Demonise-George-Bush-Game, as long as they do so, the human race will live under the shadow of the scythe. Here is the news. The current attempted uprising in China is an Al Qaeda operation. The Uighurs are not like the innocent peaceloving Tibetans whose country was invaded by the Chinese Communist Party in 1959. The Uighurs are not a peaceful people. The Uighurs are an Al Qaeda franchise. They are a Muslim separatist movement operating in a region that is an historic part of China. Among the detainees cheerfully released from Guantanamo Bay last month by President Stylish, were more than a dozen Uighur Al Qaeda terrorist killers who could scarcely believe their luck at being set free to kill again, and immediately went into CNN mode: "I don't know how I got here. The Americans tortured me. George Bush, him heap bad man." Bloody hell. Barack is going to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Why don't you nuke swine flu Barack? That's about your speed. Oh yeah, and save the environment. Dreadful incompetent. Dreadful dreadful. Dreadful. Barack's slogan "yes we can" should now be taken up by Al Qaeda. Meaning, yes we can get out of Guantanamo Bay. Yes we can plan new and limitless massacres of citizens of the free world. Yes we can detonate atomic bombs in western cities. They can and they will. Or if not, why not? Bloody hell. But I digress. I would counsel you all to withold your support from this new Muslim secessionist movement composed of Uighur Muslims attempting to detach Xinjiang province from China. In our lifetimes we have seen inmigrating Muslims detach regions from several other countries, most notably Kosovo from Serbia last year, and Northern Cyprus from Cyprus in the 1970's. I would say it is not a good idea to encourage Muslim immigrants to detach provinces from countries that give them a home. It sets a bad precedent. It confuses em. You won't hear it on CNN but the Uighurs are not worth your sympathy. They are a separatist movement working for Al Qaeda. They are nothing else. In fact already, they have become the purveyors of a singularly twisted Al Qaeda miracle. They have put the Communist Party of China in the right.