an open letter to gerard moloney editor of reality magazine
Gerard Moloney.
Your magazine which you title Reality claims in its front page slogan to be "informing, inspiring and challenging today's Catholic."
Like other essentially liberal atheistic publications which do not have the courage to admit their liberal atheism, you use the ancient, beautiful and true Catholic Church as a flag of convenience.
Gerard Moloney I am asking you to stop doing this.
I came across an edition of your magazine several months ago.
You had commissioned a female provincial journalist to write an article enquiring as to whether the Irish media was generally biased against the Catholic Church.
Gerard Moloney I wish to suggest to you that commissioning a provincial journalist with no hard news analytical skills to write on such a subject was disingenuous in the extreme.
A girl with a weather eye on a possible career beyond provincial journalism was never going to risk alienating the only three national media groups in the country, to wit Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times and the broadcaster RTE.
She was never going to risk alienating them even assuming she might have had the vocabulary or the principles to do so.
You knew full well that her soft soap and tosh talk about occasional anti Catholic bias from individuals was pure nonsense.
You knew Gerard Moloney,as well as I know, that Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times, and RTE are virulently anti Catholic organisations.
You knew Gerard Moloney that these organisations have for four decades manipulated sex abuse victims as a tool in their war against Christian values.
You knew Gerard Moloney as well as I do, that these organisations have hypocritically pretended to care about sex abuse victims while ignoring the 99.99 percent of sex abuse victims who weren't abused by Christian people and who were therefore no use to Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times and RTE in their propaganda war against the church.
You knew the identities of Soviet sympathisers, IRA terrorists and communist infiltrators working at the upper levels of RTE, Independent Newspapers and The Irish Times.
You knew all this Gerard Moloney.
Because everyone in journalism knows it.
And you knew the individual you commissioned to write an article about such bias would not have the insight, the vocabulary or the wherewithall to confront the anti Catholic bigots who have been seeking to destroy the church so that they themselves can remake Ireland in their own image.
You knew that the little girl writing the article could not begin to describe the conspiracy that is before our eyes.
You knew.
So her article was a tissue of flannel stating one thing, then stating the opposite and concluding nothing.
The girl's incompetence does not excuse her criminal concealment of what Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times and RTE have been doing to the church for forty years.
But the real responsibility is yours Gerard Moloney.
The premise of that article was a grotesque falsehood masquerading in cliches and designed solely to conceal the blatent media persecution of the ancient church while purporting to investigate the possibility of such bias.
That was the premise of the article Gerard Moloney and that was the lie you intended to propagate in commissioning the article from such a source.
I came across another copy of your magazine in May.
This edition purported to be examinging "the church in a time of crisis."
This edition was full of faux pious articles from liberal padres about what you and they alleged was a crisis in the church.
Several of your contributors feigned concern for sex abuse victims but none cared to feign concern for the hundreds of thousands of sex abuse victims in Ireland who are ignored because their abusers were not Catholic and whose victimhood therefore is of no use to liberals in their attempts to destroy the Catholic Church.
All sex abuse victims are important Gerard Moloney, but some sex abuse victims are more important than others, eh?
Not once did your contributors refer to the massive worldwide cultural conspiracy against the church, a conspiracy which is predicated on the misrepresentation of child abuse and the concealment by the media of the vast preponderance of child abuse victims who cannot be hijacked as tools against religion.
Your own editorial, heavily laden with puerile inuendos, called for the appointment of an "outsider" to investigate the church.
I think you showed your colours there.
But thinking people already know your colours.
I was interested enough by your May manipulations Gerard Moloney to check out your magazine a third time.
I purchased the June edition.
Your editorial in this edition adoped a new posture.
You posed as one who recognises the broad extent of sex abuse in society outside of the church.
You pretended that you too were concerned about broader societal abuses, and not just about the tiny minority of cases which have involved those posing as church members.
Your editorial was a snowjob Gerard Moloney.
It was designed to protect your own negligible credibility as a commentator on events.
And even as you posed and preened, you still found time for yet another bright shining lie.
Your editorial in this edition contained the following magnificently false statement:
"The media have done the Catholic Church in Ireland and throughout the world an extraordinary service in highlighting the problem of clerical sex abuse and its cover up."
It was perhaps the most crass of the lies you've been peddling.
It came, as I say, couched in an editorial which attempted to preserve for yourself some personal credibility by at last making minor mention of the facts about the true extent of sex abuse in our society, the epidemic of sexual dysfunction throughout our atheised culture that people like me have been struggling to bring to public attention.
Your editorial even deigned to refer to concerns about the care of children in Health Board custody.
Mighty big of you.
Big.
But perhaps a tad late.
Ireland's laicised liberal atheistic Health Boards have been presiding over the deaths of children in their care at a rate that would embarass the Marquis De Sade.
Yeah Gerard Moloney, you mentioned concerns about Health Boards in your snow job editorial.
Yet you made no reference to the deaths of the children in their care.
You made no reference to the fact that at least 160 children have been murdered in Health Board care in the past ten years.
Nor did you trouble to mention the fact that the Health Boards have been refusing to release files on the children murdered in their care.
Nor did you even so much as mention the deliberate Health Board concealment of these murders.
As you well know Gerard Moloney, up until a few months ago, the Health Boards were claiming only a dozen children had died in their care.
Hilarious Moloney.
Obviously when you're telling a lie, you like to tell a big one.
Your article admitted belatedly and in terms still designed to uphold the anti Catholic media pogrom against the church, that there was indeed an epidemic of sexual abuse across our society.
Well Gerard Moloney.
Your editorial was many things.
Machiavellian.
Dishonourable.
Venal.
Vile.
But never for a minute stupid.
I turned to the back of your magazine.
At the back of the June edition of your magazine, you have a quotes column.
The column featured a cornball quote from the American television personality Oprah Winfrey.
You quoted Oprah Winfrey as saying:
"My philosophy is that not only are you responsible for your life, but doing the best at this moment puts you in the best place for the next moment."
Semi literate cornball drivel.
Strangely while holding up the wisdom of Oprah Winfrey for our admiration, your magazine, which is so concerned about child sexual abuse, made no absolutely no mention of the systematic child sexual abuse at a school established by Oprah Winfrey in Africa.
Why?
Admittedly Winfrey is a bit new to the Educating The Starving Millions game and has arrived at the party a full two thousand years after the Catholic Church.
But why does she merit a free pass from you Gerard Moloney when the very first school she establishes turns out to be a cover for paedophiles violating and abusing children?
Your quotes column also featured a statement from South African revolutionary Nelson Mandela.
You quoted Nelson Mandela as saying:
"As we let our own light shine we unconciously give other people permission to do the same."
At least his speech writer's grammer is moderately superior to that of Oprah Winfrey's speech writer.
So you quote Nelson Mandela.
Yet you made no mention that Nelson Mandela's then wife Winnie Mandela had violated and murdered a 13 year old boy called Stompie Moeketsie at the Mandela family home in Soweto while Nelson was serving jail time in the 1980's.
She killed the boy with a garden shears Gerard Moloney.
Other children died in mysterious circumstances in the Mandela family home.
I have been unable to ascertain whether she used the garden shears on all of them.
Tell me Gerard Moloney.
At what point do people like you have a duty to victims like those?
I mean a duty to even mention them while you're busy eulogising Nelson Mandela and Oprah Winfrey.
At what point do you have a duty to display even a modicum of concern for the tens of millions of sex abuse victims all over the world, the 99.99 percent of sex abuse victims, who are ignored because they weren't abused by someone the media could use in their culture war against Christianity?
At what point Gerard Moloney do you have a duty to the truth?
James Healy
Your magazine which you title Reality claims in its front page slogan to be "informing, inspiring and challenging today's Catholic."
Like other essentially liberal atheistic publications which do not have the courage to admit their liberal atheism, you use the ancient, beautiful and true Catholic Church as a flag of convenience.
Gerard Moloney I am asking you to stop doing this.
I came across an edition of your magazine several months ago.
You had commissioned a female provincial journalist to write an article enquiring as to whether the Irish media was generally biased against the Catholic Church.
Gerard Moloney I wish to suggest to you that commissioning a provincial journalist with no hard news analytical skills to write on such a subject was disingenuous in the extreme.
A girl with a weather eye on a possible career beyond provincial journalism was never going to risk alienating the only three national media groups in the country, to wit Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times and the broadcaster RTE.
She was never going to risk alienating them even assuming she might have had the vocabulary or the principles to do so.
You knew full well that her soft soap and tosh talk about occasional anti Catholic bias from individuals was pure nonsense.
You knew Gerard Moloney,as well as I know, that Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times, and RTE are virulently anti Catholic organisations.
You knew Gerard Moloney that these organisations have for four decades manipulated sex abuse victims as a tool in their war against Christian values.
You knew Gerard Moloney as well as I do, that these organisations have hypocritically pretended to care about sex abuse victims while ignoring the 99.99 percent of sex abuse victims who weren't abused by Christian people and who were therefore no use to Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times and RTE in their propaganda war against the church.
You knew the identities of Soviet sympathisers, IRA terrorists and communist infiltrators working at the upper levels of RTE, Independent Newspapers and The Irish Times.
You knew all this Gerard Moloney.
Because everyone in journalism knows it.
And you knew the individual you commissioned to write an article about such bias would not have the insight, the vocabulary or the wherewithall to confront the anti Catholic bigots who have been seeking to destroy the church so that they themselves can remake Ireland in their own image.
You knew that the little girl writing the article could not begin to describe the conspiracy that is before our eyes.
You knew.
So her article was a tissue of flannel stating one thing, then stating the opposite and concluding nothing.
The girl's incompetence does not excuse her criminal concealment of what Independent Newspapers, The Irish Times and RTE have been doing to the church for forty years.
But the real responsibility is yours Gerard Moloney.
The premise of that article was a grotesque falsehood masquerading in cliches and designed solely to conceal the blatent media persecution of the ancient church while purporting to investigate the possibility of such bias.
That was the premise of the article Gerard Moloney and that was the lie you intended to propagate in commissioning the article from such a source.
I came across another copy of your magazine in May.
This edition purported to be examinging "the church in a time of crisis."
This edition was full of faux pious articles from liberal padres about what you and they alleged was a crisis in the church.
Several of your contributors feigned concern for sex abuse victims but none cared to feign concern for the hundreds of thousands of sex abuse victims in Ireland who are ignored because their abusers were not Catholic and whose victimhood therefore is of no use to liberals in their attempts to destroy the Catholic Church.
All sex abuse victims are important Gerard Moloney, but some sex abuse victims are more important than others, eh?
Not once did your contributors refer to the massive worldwide cultural conspiracy against the church, a conspiracy which is predicated on the misrepresentation of child abuse and the concealment by the media of the vast preponderance of child abuse victims who cannot be hijacked as tools against religion.
Your own editorial, heavily laden with puerile inuendos, called for the appointment of an "outsider" to investigate the church.
I think you showed your colours there.
But thinking people already know your colours.
I was interested enough by your May manipulations Gerard Moloney to check out your magazine a third time.
I purchased the June edition.
Your editorial in this edition adoped a new posture.
You posed as one who recognises the broad extent of sex abuse in society outside of the church.
You pretended that you too were concerned about broader societal abuses, and not just about the tiny minority of cases which have involved those posing as church members.
Your editorial was a snowjob Gerard Moloney.
It was designed to protect your own negligible credibility as a commentator on events.
And even as you posed and preened, you still found time for yet another bright shining lie.
Your editorial in this edition contained the following magnificently false statement:
"The media have done the Catholic Church in Ireland and throughout the world an extraordinary service in highlighting the problem of clerical sex abuse and its cover up."
It was perhaps the most crass of the lies you've been peddling.
It came, as I say, couched in an editorial which attempted to preserve for yourself some personal credibility by at last making minor mention of the facts about the true extent of sex abuse in our society, the epidemic of sexual dysfunction throughout our atheised culture that people like me have been struggling to bring to public attention.
Your editorial even deigned to refer to concerns about the care of children in Health Board custody.
Mighty big of you.
Big.
But perhaps a tad late.
Ireland's laicised liberal atheistic Health Boards have been presiding over the deaths of children in their care at a rate that would embarass the Marquis De Sade.
Yeah Gerard Moloney, you mentioned concerns about Health Boards in your snow job editorial.
Yet you made no reference to the deaths of the children in their care.
You made no reference to the fact that at least 160 children have been murdered in Health Board care in the past ten years.
Nor did you trouble to mention the fact that the Health Boards have been refusing to release files on the children murdered in their care.
Nor did you even so much as mention the deliberate Health Board concealment of these murders.
As you well know Gerard Moloney, up until a few months ago, the Health Boards were claiming only a dozen children had died in their care.
Hilarious Moloney.
Obviously when you're telling a lie, you like to tell a big one.
Your article admitted belatedly and in terms still designed to uphold the anti Catholic media pogrom against the church, that there was indeed an epidemic of sexual abuse across our society.
Well Gerard Moloney.
Your editorial was many things.
Machiavellian.
Dishonourable.
Venal.
Vile.
But never for a minute stupid.
I turned to the back of your magazine.
At the back of the June edition of your magazine, you have a quotes column.
The column featured a cornball quote from the American television personality Oprah Winfrey.
You quoted Oprah Winfrey as saying:
"My philosophy is that not only are you responsible for your life, but doing the best at this moment puts you in the best place for the next moment."
Semi literate cornball drivel.
Strangely while holding up the wisdom of Oprah Winfrey for our admiration, your magazine, which is so concerned about child sexual abuse, made no absolutely no mention of the systematic child sexual abuse at a school established by Oprah Winfrey in Africa.
Why?
Admittedly Winfrey is a bit new to the Educating The Starving Millions game and has arrived at the party a full two thousand years after the Catholic Church.
But why does she merit a free pass from you Gerard Moloney when the very first school she establishes turns out to be a cover for paedophiles violating and abusing children?
Your quotes column also featured a statement from South African revolutionary Nelson Mandela.
You quoted Nelson Mandela as saying:
"As we let our own light shine we unconciously give other people permission to do the same."
At least his speech writer's grammer is moderately superior to that of Oprah Winfrey's speech writer.
So you quote Nelson Mandela.
Yet you made no mention that Nelson Mandela's then wife Winnie Mandela had violated and murdered a 13 year old boy called Stompie Moeketsie at the Mandela family home in Soweto while Nelson was serving jail time in the 1980's.
She killed the boy with a garden shears Gerard Moloney.
Other children died in mysterious circumstances in the Mandela family home.
I have been unable to ascertain whether she used the garden shears on all of them.
Tell me Gerard Moloney.
At what point do people like you have a duty to victims like those?
I mean a duty to even mention them while you're busy eulogising Nelson Mandela and Oprah Winfrey.
At what point do you have a duty to display even a modicum of concern for the tens of millions of sex abuse victims all over the world, the 99.99 percent of sex abuse victims, who are ignored because they weren't abused by someone the media could use in their culture war against Christianity?
At what point Gerard Moloney do you have a duty to the truth?
James Healy
posted by heelers | 1:50 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home