reflections on light

Prevailing scientific conceptions of light contain mutually contradictory assertions as to its nature.
Paradoxical notions may be retained and may be true.
Mutually contradictory notions imply a lacuna in the theory or that it is incorrect.
My suggestions...

1. Light has no speed. It has no mass so it can have no speed.

2. What we call light is difficult to define as one thing or event because it is several things or events happening at once and always together.

3. Light begins with an emanating omnidirectional agitation or energy likenable in its effect to a stone dropping into a pool of water.

4. Light is the effect of the initial emanating omnidirectional agitation on a medium. The existence of this medium is now disputed. It was formerly conceived of by scientists as the ether or the od. The particle attributes of light stem from the effect of the emanating energy on the medium.

5. The medium is the balance of forces present all around us and possibly to the end of the universe.

6. The ripple effect of light's source emanating energy if uninterrupted is instantly displaced to the end of the universe, or in metaphor to the end of the pool.

7. The only limits to the displacement of the ripple effect component of light are objects or forces in the medium such as dust motes, walls, planets et al.

8. Light is also the participation of a human consciousness via eye sight in the light event.

9. Light as we attempt to measure it and conceive of it, does not exist unless the emanating energy, the ripple effect and a consciousness are all present.