the department of dirty tricks
The following attempts have been made to sabotage Sarah Palin's candidacy for the position of Vice President of the United States.
1. Charles Gibson of the ABC television network in a nationally broadcast interview asked Sarah Palin what she thought of the Bush Doctrine. Charles Gibson refused to explain to Sarah Palin what he meant by the question. Charles Gibson behaved as if his guest should have known what his meaningless question meant. Here is the news. There is no generally accepted political definition of the Bush Doctrine. The term was initially used years ago by a commentator called Charles Krauthammer to describe President Bush's posture on environmental issues. The term has been used by some of us to describe Mr Bush's policy regarding the defence of Taiwan against any possible Chinese aggression. At different times the term has been used to describe different policies in the War On Terror. Charles Gibson of ABC pretends that when he uses the term everyone should know he means something along the lines of a supposed Presidential policy favouring pre-emptive strikes against America's enemies. But Mr Krauthammer the originator of the phrase, attests that in the intervening years since Mr Krauthammer himself first used the expression, there have been at least four separate major policy decisions by President Bush which have temporarily been described by media commentators as the Bush Doctrine. Mr Krauthammer who was the first to use the term, claims that Charles Gibson's behaviour in expecting Sarah Palin to know what meaning Charles Gibson was ascribing to the term on this particular day, was thoroughly unreasonable. I am suggesting that Charles Gibson of ABC was being manipulative, mendacious and malign, by asking Sarah Palin a question that could not possibly be answered due to the nebulousness of the terms in which the interviewer had framed it.
2. Katie Couric, a shill for the Democratic Party who occasionally poses as a newsreader for the CBS television network, in a nationally broadcast interview asked Sarah Palin which of John McCain's voting decisions she most agreed with. The question was so vaguely, indeed opaquely, phrased that again it was virtually impossible to answer. Here is the news. John McCain himself would have had difficulty itemising his voting record over the past forty years. This wasn't a Gotcha question as Katie Couric's (very few) defenders maintain. This question was manipulative, mendacious and malign. (See above.) Katie Couric is a five time winner of the Connie Chung Award for Objectivity and Integrity in Journalism. Expect to see a lot less of her in years to come.
3. CNN has led the charge in disingenuously trying to discredit Sarah Palin for something it calls Troopergate. CNN has been assisted in this matter by supporters of Barack Obama styling themselves, CBS, NBC, ABC, Newsweek, Time Magazine, the New York Times, and the Washington Compost. Here is the news. What these Democratic Party supporters posing as journalists, newspapers or magazines, call Troopergate, is a situation involving a State Trooper who was formerly married to Sarah Palin's sister. Obama supporters in the legislature have wrongfully and vexatiously alleged that Sarah Palin fired a senior official in Alaska from his job for himself refusing to fire the State Trooper. The salient piece of information about this State Trooper is that he tasered a ten year old boy. In my opinion, one doesn't need any more information on this case. Suggestions that Sarah Palin acted improperly are irrelevant. The truth is that as far as most of us are concerned she actually should have fired the State Trooper and anybody connected with trying to keep the State Trooper in his job. Because the State Trooper in this case was pond scum who tasered a ten year old boy. Case closed. You know folks, the pro Barrack Obama liberal media have traded for a long time on their monopoly of news reportage in the United States. Their thinking is inspired by the old Mafia dictum: The wheel is rigged but it's the only game in town. Unfortunately for CNN et al (particularly Al, I hate him) unfortunately for all these Democratic Party shills, the good citizens of America and elsewhere are starting to figure them out. The wheel is rigged and the wheel ain't got no viewers. And many of us are starting to establish our own games in our own towns, not run on Mafia principles, but run on priciples of truth, justice, egalitarianism and fairplay.
4. The enquiry into Troopergate was deliberately scheduled by Barrack Obama's supporters in the legislature to announce its results three weeks before the Presidential elections. This scheduling was a blatent attempt to prevent Sarah Palin from having time to properly refute any allegations of wrongdoing the enquiry might have frivolously chosen to ascribe to her. Worse than that, it was an attempt to affect the decision of the electorate in choosing the next President and Vice President of the United States of America. In the end, the enquiry has found she was not guilty of any of the charges of impropriety it had sought to manufacture against her. This complete exoneration of Sarah Palin was utterly unnecessary for those of us who knew that the State Trooper had tasered a ten year old boy. The whole thing was a snow job. Even down to the lingering accusation on the Enquiry's part that Sarah Palin somehow improperly allowed her husband to meddle in the Troopergate situation. Once more with feeling. Here is the news. The early scheduling of the release of the Troopergate Enquiry results was an egregious example of partisan investigators running pass defence for Barrack Obama's Presidential campaign. They aren't going to get away with it.
5. The son of a Democratic Party politician has been caught hacking into Sarah Palin's computer and stealing her private correspondence. He faces criminal charges for hacking into Sarah Palin's computer. My analysis is that he hacked into Sarah Palin's computer at the behest of elements within the Democratic Party, including his Daddy, who are attempting to secure Barrack Obama's election as President. Sing it loud. Here is the news. The trial date for this son of a senior Democratic Party politician charged with hacking into Sarah Palin's computer, has been set for December. Yes, that's right. December The trial date of the Barrack Obama supporter who hacked into Sarah Palin's computer will not take place until the American Presidential election is over. Contrast this with the early pre-election release of the Troopergate Enquiry. Clearly elements within the Judiciary are themselves attempting to run pass defence for Barrack Obama. The postponement of the trial of this saboteur son of a senior Barrack Obama supporter is a foul trahesion of jurisprudence. It is also a bitterly crass dereliction of duty by those members of the judiciary involved in its promulgation. The decision to delay the trial until December for the Democratic Party pro Obama son of a senior left wing politician who hacked into Sarah Palin's computer, then stole and published her private correspondence, the decision to delay the trial I say, has been implented solely for the purposes of helping Barrack Obama into the office of the Presidency of the United States of America.
6. And finally... CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Newsweek, Time Magazine, the New York Times and the Washington Pot Roast, have latterly all begun complaining about Sarah Palin's negative style of campaigning. These are the same media entities who have treasonously conspired to demonise President Bush during the period of maximum threat to the world from our Jihad enemies over the past seven years. Yup. CNN and company. They're the ones whining about negative campaigning. Can this be for real? CNN is against negativity? Okay. Let us be clear. CNN and these other media groups who worry so much about negativity, are the same ones who for nearly a decade have banded together to dishonourably and maliciously accuse President Bush of the most grievous war crimes. They have conspired to sow in the public mind unconscionably false and treasonous propaganda, to wit: "Bush lied, people died." They have done so with no discernible purpose other than to break American resolve in the worldwide conflict with Muslim extremism and thereby to bring down President Bush. They have trumpeted American losses on the battlefield while ignoring the massive defeats inflicted on Al Qaeda and the Taliban. They have intoned with fake solemnity the names of the American dead while neglecting to dwell over much on the unhappy demise of Uday and Qusay those two lovable Hussein boys who will never again force any human being into an acid bath, never again precisely because President Bush authorised the American army to send them home to Allah. Let me be blunt. CNN and its associates have shamelessly exploited every human rights violation they could trump up against the American army, including the occasional genuine one such as Abu Graib, while all but ignoring the satanic desecrations and vitiations of humanity inflicted by Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the Islamic Republic of Iran. CNN and friends have failed to champion Iraqi and Afghan democracy for fear some of the credit might percolate to President Bush. Incredibly at times, they have even gone in to bat for the late great Saddam Hussein (may he rest in pieces) and his murderous family, claiming that if the Americans didn't find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then the invasion must have been unjustified. What strange high bastardy is this? I'll tell you. This... is... CNN... (Imagine me saying it like that silly portentous James Earl Jones voice over which the station uses to advertise itself.) And they have promoted as gospel the anti American, anti President Bush, anti life, anti freedom, views of a legion of fellow traitors including the psychotic Norman Mailer, the opprobrious Michael Moore, the quisling John Pilger, the pseudo commie Noam Chomsky, and of course the pissant little hanger on Vincent Bugliosi who thinks he's going to impeach President Bush. Good luck with that one Vinnie. You git. These guys aren't fifth columnists exactly. Fifth columnists sometimes have courage. These are just cowards selling out their own side to Al Qaeda and the Taliban in pursuit of a short term political agenda. They have given succour to the enemy. Oh they have alright. Because from his hideout Osama Bin Laden realised very early on in the War On Terror that these invidious media bast--ds were actually rooting for him. Al Qaeda was losing on every battlefield it showed up to. (They're good against unarmed air hostesses. Less good against the American army.) But the Jihadi's figured it out. From their reading of Time Magazine, and their fascinated viewing of CNN, they saw that there was something still to play for. They concluded that through the influence of the liberal left wing pro Democratic Party media, America might yet be defeated on the homefront. Here is the news you useless fifth century Islamist galoots. It ain't gonna happen. Barrack Obama loses. You lose. Freedom wins.
Every time.
(Ed Note: James Healy has bet his last two thousand smackers that John McCain will win the American Presidential elections.)
1. Charles Gibson of the ABC television network in a nationally broadcast interview asked Sarah Palin what she thought of the Bush Doctrine. Charles Gibson refused to explain to Sarah Palin what he meant by the question. Charles Gibson behaved as if his guest should have known what his meaningless question meant. Here is the news. There is no generally accepted political definition of the Bush Doctrine. The term was initially used years ago by a commentator called Charles Krauthammer to describe President Bush's posture on environmental issues. The term has been used by some of us to describe Mr Bush's policy regarding the defence of Taiwan against any possible Chinese aggression. At different times the term has been used to describe different policies in the War On Terror. Charles Gibson of ABC pretends that when he uses the term everyone should know he means something along the lines of a supposed Presidential policy favouring pre-emptive strikes against America's enemies. But Mr Krauthammer the originator of the phrase, attests that in the intervening years since Mr Krauthammer himself first used the expression, there have been at least four separate major policy decisions by President Bush which have temporarily been described by media commentators as the Bush Doctrine. Mr Krauthammer who was the first to use the term, claims that Charles Gibson's behaviour in expecting Sarah Palin to know what meaning Charles Gibson was ascribing to the term on this particular day, was thoroughly unreasonable. I am suggesting that Charles Gibson of ABC was being manipulative, mendacious and malign, by asking Sarah Palin a question that could not possibly be answered due to the nebulousness of the terms in which the interviewer had framed it.
2. Katie Couric, a shill for the Democratic Party who occasionally poses as a newsreader for the CBS television network, in a nationally broadcast interview asked Sarah Palin which of John McCain's voting decisions she most agreed with. The question was so vaguely, indeed opaquely, phrased that again it was virtually impossible to answer. Here is the news. John McCain himself would have had difficulty itemising his voting record over the past forty years. This wasn't a Gotcha question as Katie Couric's (very few) defenders maintain. This question was manipulative, mendacious and malign. (See above.) Katie Couric is a five time winner of the Connie Chung Award for Objectivity and Integrity in Journalism. Expect to see a lot less of her in years to come.
3. CNN has led the charge in disingenuously trying to discredit Sarah Palin for something it calls Troopergate. CNN has been assisted in this matter by supporters of Barack Obama styling themselves, CBS, NBC, ABC, Newsweek, Time Magazine, the New York Times, and the Washington Compost. Here is the news. What these Democratic Party supporters posing as journalists, newspapers or magazines, call Troopergate, is a situation involving a State Trooper who was formerly married to Sarah Palin's sister. Obama supporters in the legislature have wrongfully and vexatiously alleged that Sarah Palin fired a senior official in Alaska from his job for himself refusing to fire the State Trooper. The salient piece of information about this State Trooper is that he tasered a ten year old boy. In my opinion, one doesn't need any more information on this case. Suggestions that Sarah Palin acted improperly are irrelevant. The truth is that as far as most of us are concerned she actually should have fired the State Trooper and anybody connected with trying to keep the State Trooper in his job. Because the State Trooper in this case was pond scum who tasered a ten year old boy. Case closed. You know folks, the pro Barrack Obama liberal media have traded for a long time on their monopoly of news reportage in the United States. Their thinking is inspired by the old Mafia dictum: The wheel is rigged but it's the only game in town. Unfortunately for CNN et al (particularly Al, I hate him) unfortunately for all these Democratic Party shills, the good citizens of America and elsewhere are starting to figure them out. The wheel is rigged and the wheel ain't got no viewers. And many of us are starting to establish our own games in our own towns, not run on Mafia principles, but run on priciples of truth, justice, egalitarianism and fairplay.
4. The enquiry into Troopergate was deliberately scheduled by Barrack Obama's supporters in the legislature to announce its results three weeks before the Presidential elections. This scheduling was a blatent attempt to prevent Sarah Palin from having time to properly refute any allegations of wrongdoing the enquiry might have frivolously chosen to ascribe to her. Worse than that, it was an attempt to affect the decision of the electorate in choosing the next President and Vice President of the United States of America. In the end, the enquiry has found she was not guilty of any of the charges of impropriety it had sought to manufacture against her. This complete exoneration of Sarah Palin was utterly unnecessary for those of us who knew that the State Trooper had tasered a ten year old boy. The whole thing was a snow job. Even down to the lingering accusation on the Enquiry's part that Sarah Palin somehow improperly allowed her husband to meddle in the Troopergate situation. Once more with feeling. Here is the news. The early scheduling of the release of the Troopergate Enquiry results was an egregious example of partisan investigators running pass defence for Barrack Obama's Presidential campaign. They aren't going to get away with it.
5. The son of a Democratic Party politician has been caught hacking into Sarah Palin's computer and stealing her private correspondence. He faces criminal charges for hacking into Sarah Palin's computer. My analysis is that he hacked into Sarah Palin's computer at the behest of elements within the Democratic Party, including his Daddy, who are attempting to secure Barrack Obama's election as President. Sing it loud. Here is the news. The trial date for this son of a senior Democratic Party politician charged with hacking into Sarah Palin's computer, has been set for December. Yes, that's right. December The trial date of the Barrack Obama supporter who hacked into Sarah Palin's computer will not take place until the American Presidential election is over. Contrast this with the early pre-election release of the Troopergate Enquiry. Clearly elements within the Judiciary are themselves attempting to run pass defence for Barrack Obama. The postponement of the trial of this saboteur son of a senior Barrack Obama supporter is a foul trahesion of jurisprudence. It is also a bitterly crass dereliction of duty by those members of the judiciary involved in its promulgation. The decision to delay the trial until December for the Democratic Party pro Obama son of a senior left wing politician who hacked into Sarah Palin's computer, then stole and published her private correspondence, the decision to delay the trial I say, has been implented solely for the purposes of helping Barrack Obama into the office of the Presidency of the United States of America.
6. And finally... CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Newsweek, Time Magazine, the New York Times and the Washington Pot Roast, have latterly all begun complaining about Sarah Palin's negative style of campaigning. These are the same media entities who have treasonously conspired to demonise President Bush during the period of maximum threat to the world from our Jihad enemies over the past seven years. Yup. CNN and company. They're the ones whining about negative campaigning. Can this be for real? CNN is against negativity? Okay. Let us be clear. CNN and these other media groups who worry so much about negativity, are the same ones who for nearly a decade have banded together to dishonourably and maliciously accuse President Bush of the most grievous war crimes. They have conspired to sow in the public mind unconscionably false and treasonous propaganda, to wit: "Bush lied, people died." They have done so with no discernible purpose other than to break American resolve in the worldwide conflict with Muslim extremism and thereby to bring down President Bush. They have trumpeted American losses on the battlefield while ignoring the massive defeats inflicted on Al Qaeda and the Taliban. They have intoned with fake solemnity the names of the American dead while neglecting to dwell over much on the unhappy demise of Uday and Qusay those two lovable Hussein boys who will never again force any human being into an acid bath, never again precisely because President Bush authorised the American army to send them home to Allah. Let me be blunt. CNN and its associates have shamelessly exploited every human rights violation they could trump up against the American army, including the occasional genuine one such as Abu Graib, while all but ignoring the satanic desecrations and vitiations of humanity inflicted by Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the Islamic Republic of Iran. CNN and friends have failed to champion Iraqi and Afghan democracy for fear some of the credit might percolate to President Bush. Incredibly at times, they have even gone in to bat for the late great Saddam Hussein (may he rest in pieces) and his murderous family, claiming that if the Americans didn't find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, then the invasion must have been unjustified. What strange high bastardy is this? I'll tell you. This... is... CNN... (Imagine me saying it like that silly portentous James Earl Jones voice over which the station uses to advertise itself.) And they have promoted as gospel the anti American, anti President Bush, anti life, anti freedom, views of a legion of fellow traitors including the psychotic Norman Mailer, the opprobrious Michael Moore, the quisling John Pilger, the pseudo commie Noam Chomsky, and of course the pissant little hanger on Vincent Bugliosi who thinks he's going to impeach President Bush. Good luck with that one Vinnie. You git. These guys aren't fifth columnists exactly. Fifth columnists sometimes have courage. These are just cowards selling out their own side to Al Qaeda and the Taliban in pursuit of a short term political agenda. They have given succour to the enemy. Oh they have alright. Because from his hideout Osama Bin Laden realised very early on in the War On Terror that these invidious media bast--ds were actually rooting for him. Al Qaeda was losing on every battlefield it showed up to. (They're good against unarmed air hostesses. Less good against the American army.) But the Jihadi's figured it out. From their reading of Time Magazine, and their fascinated viewing of CNN, they saw that there was something still to play for. They concluded that through the influence of the liberal left wing pro Democratic Party media, America might yet be defeated on the homefront. Here is the news you useless fifth century Islamist galoots. It ain't gonna happen. Barrack Obama loses. You lose. Freedom wins.
Every time.
(Ed Note: James Healy has bet his last two thousand smackers that John McCain will win the American Presidential elections.)
posted by heelers | 3:32 AM
6 Comments:
Oh Gosh James - I hope you are right (about the bet)
My favorite question Katie Couric (who by the way looks like a demented gerbil - just not as cute) was about what magazines Sarah read. Huh???? Who gives a rats ass what magazines she reads! And she kept pressing for an answer. I was astounded and wondered why no one else was...
Oh jeez - left out some commas. You never misplace commas. It's late - I'm going to bed. Slip the commas in for me, would you?
No one needs to sabotage Palin's candidacy-- simply read the facts about her history and "management" of Alaska as governor and mayor.
Read the report on her pressuring our state employees to fire a trooper for personal reasons. No one in Alaska has ever claimed Palin couldn't fire the police commissioner. The issue is using our public resources for her personal gain-- abuse of power.
Adrienne, you make my life complete.
MPB, it's real simple. The State Trooper tasered a ten year old kid. Firing this State Trooper or the Democratic Party shill who was protecting him, isn't a case of personal gain for Sarah Palin. The State Trooper tasered a ten year old kid. Firing him or the Democratic Party shill who protected him isn't a misuse of Alaskan resources. The State Trooper tasered a ten year old kid. Firing him or the Democratic shill who protected him isn't an abuse of power. These invidious child tasering Democratic Party supporting pond scum got off lightly. I gotta say it MPB. If you Obama supporters think you can manipulate that situation to discredit Sarah Palin, even with an "Enquiry" conducted solely by partisan members of the Democratic Party, why then, you're sicker than the State Trooper. (The one who tasered a ten year old boy. And should have been fired if not shot. Along with the Democratic Party supporting State official who was insisting on keeping this State Trooper in his job.)
Good luck in future with your highly objective unbiased blogosphere commentaries on Sarah Palin.
Try and put your name on the next one.
If you're not too ashamed.
James
mpb - That state trooper should be thanking his lucky stars I didn't send my best friend Tony (Soprano) to deal with the issue. Tony and my cousin Vinnie (when I can roust him off the couch, know how to deal with vermin that taser little boys, drink on the job, and brutalize their wives....
Sarah Palin showed admirable restraint....she should get a medal!
Adrienne, remind me never to fall out with you.
J
Post a Comment
<< Home