assassinating mcguinness

There's nothing like a gaggle of liberal atheistic hypocrites in full cry pursuing some arbitrarily designated fox they've tacitly agreed must be removed from public view.
So all this week the anti Catholic media groups of the Republic of Ireland have been pressing home their attempts to sabotage the Presidential campaign of Martin McGuinness.
An Independent Newspapers article yesterday ran with the headline: Not The Sort Of President We Want.
What Independent Newspapers want doesn't matter of course.
Independent Newspapers doesn't get to say who's President.
Not yet they don't.
We have elections.
Those elections are decided by what the people want.
Or so I've been told.
I find it quaint that Independent Newspapers in seeking to remove this particular candidate from public consideration, has discovered a new abhorrence for the IRA, and for leftist militants in general, and for Martin McGuinness in particular.
I mean look at the personnel in senior management and editorial positions at Independent Newspapers.
Most of them spent their youth advocating the take over of the world by Joe Stalin, the Soviet Union and/or Chairman Mao.
A goodly portion of them were actively cheerleading the IRA in the early 1970's and beyond.
I am referring of course to those firebrand student radicals and career Anti Catholics of the late 1960's early 1970's in Ireland, Emma Harris, Eoghan Harris, Aonghus Fanning and Gene Kerrigan.
Pious hypocrites is too kind a phrase.
White washed sepulchres comes closer.
With emphasis on the curs.
At least Martin McGuinness had the courage of his convictions.
A gunman he may have been.
But at least he didn't subvert the nation, culture and faith of Ireland from behind a typewriter as the management and staff at Independent Newspapers have done and are doing.
I tell you these heroes of Independent Newspapers were lauding the IRA when the violence in Northern Ireland was at its height.
Okay.
Maybe fairness requires I should mention Independent Newspapers former feature writer the anti Catholic atheist Eamon Dunphy, since he did indeed write some heartfelt and courageous criticisms of the IRA in the 1980's.
Until he started going on the beer with them.
His bold impassioned critique, shall we say, moderated after that.
Here's what I'm trying to say.
Again.
Many of the senior management at Independent Newspapers (and RTE and the Irish Times) who are now trying to label McGuinness a bloodthirsty Marxist revolutionary were and are themselves advocates of Marxist revolution.
Some of them have been so throughout their lifetimes.
The only difference between these cravens and Martin McGuinness is that he didn't believe in advocating Marxist revolution from an armchair.
Any Maoism or Marxism or lefty revolutionarianism that he endorsed, he did so at the risk of his own life.
Personally, I would consider his own participation in the IRA to be far more moral though I excoriated him for it, than the armchair communism of the senior staffers at Independent Newspapers, all of whom were hired by the feudal O'Reilly family simply because the O'Reillys had decided on a strategy of employing every low life treasonous Marxist scum in the country, in order to have them in the O'Reilly family tent pissing out, rather than on the outside pissing in.
Bear this in mind.
Since Martin McGuinness signed up for the peace process, he has never once reneged on the promises he gave.
He has worked in a dedicated, selfless, courteous and courageous partnership with those opponents he had spent most of his life fighting.
He is a man of integrity.
See if you can find another one of those in our current crop of Presidential candidates each of whom Independent Newspapers has been insisting are wildly popular.
How about...
How about the atheistic Maoist armchair revolutionary Michael D Higgins, or how about Gay Mitchell the first cousin of Ireland's most murderous gangster, or how about the one time advocate of legalised paedophilia David Norris?
I ask you.
Listen folks.
Are we ourselves now going to become betrayers of the peace process by altering the terms under which we have allowed former men of violence to sign up to constitutional politics and acquiescsing in a perpetual campaign by political rivals of Martin McGuinness to incriminate him and others who like Martin McGuinness have remained true to their word in renouncing violence in Northern Ireland and everywhere else?
It is Independent Newspapers, the Irish Times, and RTE, all organisations top heavy with Bolshevicks and former Bolshevicks and indeed IRA sympathisers, it is they, I tell you, who are betraying peace by attempting to derail Martin McGuinness' campaign for the Presidency simply because he is not (currently) of their stripe.
Hoo baby.
You gorra larf.
The fans of Labour Party Presidential candidate Michael D Higgins have been perhaps the most amusing of all the political and media pseuds endeavouring to pass off their ridiculous preconceptions and partisanship as genuine analysis.
A few weeks ago, Mary Kenny, a journalist with the anti Catholic Independent Newspapers group, wrote in a publication which misleadingly styles itself The Irish Catholic recommending that her readers vote for Michael D Higgins.
Mary Kenny is a decent woman but a bit of a goose.
She claims to have had a Catholic conversion at some stage.
But the Irish Catholic newspaper is not a Catholic publication. It is run for profit by those arch religionist businessmen at the Farmers Journal/Racing Post corporation.
They're religious in the sense that they religiously seek to guard their profit margins.
That's it.
And it would be more appropriate to refer to The Irish Catholic as The Irish Atheistic Liberal.
In Mary Kenny's article, she recalled that many years ago Michael D Higgins met his wife at a house party in Mary Kenny's flat.
That seemed to be the only reason she could enunciate for voting for him.
The fateful house party would of course have been a house party for atheistic Maoists seeking to import contraceptive pill culture, condom culture, and abortion culture into Ireland as Mary and her friends were doing at the time.
This week Mary Kenny updated her position vis a vis the Presidential election by giving a fairly balanced and neutral write up on all the candidates.
There was nothing in her perspective you might mistake for incisiveness or accuracy, mind you.
Nor was there anything you might call Catholic.
Her description of Michael D Higgins merely noted that had suffered much in his youth.
No mention of his Marxism, his Maoism, his abortionism, his detestation of the Catholic Church.
No mention at all.
No mention even of his support in the 1980's for Danilo Ortega De Saavedra's communist dictatorship in Nicaragua, or of his failure to repudiate the dictator of Nicaragua after the dictator of Nicaragua's adopted daughter accused the dictator of Nicaragua of raping her throughout her childhood.
Not relevant eh Mary?
Interestingly enough, Michael D Higgins supporters are shouting loud about their reservations with regard to Martin McGuinness, a former terrorist, becoming President.
Yeah.
As far as they're concerned, it's okay to have terrorists like Danilo Ortega De Saavedra who never renounced violence running Nicaragua.
But in Ireland the Maxists and Maoists of Michael D Higgins' Labour Party pretend to prefer Presidents who've never actually taken part in the revolutions they've advocated.
The machinations of the Labour Party on this issue are truly hilarious.
For a start several current Labour Party parliamentarians including Proinsias De Rossa, Pat Rabbitte, and Eamon Gilmore spent the 1970's driving around Dublin in a battered Ford Cortina robbing banks.
I have to be careful here.
If I get one of the names wrong or the make of car, I might be sued.
The Ford Motor Company takes a dim view of that sort of thing.
And I'm not sure about Gilmore.
He might have been robbing banks in Galway not Dublin.
Do you get this?
Many of the great Labour Party parliamentarians of today who are so delicately turning their noses up at Martin McGuinness were not just advocates of Chairman Mao killing millions in China.
They weren't just advocates for the wanton killing of unborn babies all over Europe and America.
They were gunman themselves.
Robbing and terrorising ordinary people for the glory of the revolution.
Many of them were also members of the IRA.
I'm just saying is all.
I mean whatever excuse McGuinness had, these scruff had none.
But I don't want to go casting no aspoyshuns.
The abortionist Maoist anti Catholic Eamon Gilmore who went on to lead the Labour Party similarly lacks the most basic moral gravumen when he apes to despise Martin McGuinness on moral grounds.
Having spent his teenage years as a jeering leftist on the Galway University students union, having spent his entire youth sneering at anyone who dared to try to uphold the right to life of unborn children or to advance openly the beautiful truths of the Catholic religion, having spent his entire life as a mewling caricature of a leftist radical, now I say, now, he wants nothing less than to persuade the gentle citizenry of our fair land that he finds Martin McGuinness somehow morally beneath him.
It's a long way down from Mount Olympus, Eamo.
These galoots who would be king should give it a rest in their unselfconsciously ironic, nay sublimely hypocritical, attempts to discredit Martin McGuinness.
They're starting to annoy me.
I do think Martin McGuinness will win the Irish Presidency and I will be voting for him.
But enough of that.
I'll be silent now.
Let the people decide.