the trial of jimmy savile by the daily mirror judge rupert murdock presiding
It was interesting to note that the Daily Mirror was this week fined 60,000 pounds for falsely, maliciously and malignly labelling a British comedian as a racist.
There was no motive for the Daily Mirror's crime beyond yet another pathetic attempt to inflate its dying readership.
The only mistake that the Daily Mirror's slanderous staff and editors made in labelling a British comedian as a racist, was that they chose a still living comedian who was alive enough at least to defend his reputation in open court.
The allegations lasted a full five seconds under cross examination.
Funny thing fairness.
Funny thing the truth.
Hilarious no.
It was also interesting to note that the Daily Mirror, the Daily Mail, and Judge Rupert Murdock's super soaraway nudy pix publishing phone sex lines trafficking citizens phones tapping police briging News International titles, gave prominence to what they callled police claims that their current target for ruination, the deceased broadcaster Jimmy Savile, may have been "the most prolific paedophile in British history."
May have been.
No need for a trial then, eh?
It emerged later that there was no such police statement on the matter.
There was a statement from an individual policeman Superintendant Peter Snodgrass, who, in trahaising the justice, truth and the law by making his comment, may or may not have understood the nature of the dilemma that the Daily Mirror, the Daily Mail, the utterly decrepit Independent Newspapers group in Ireland, along with Judge Rupert Murdock's Arsewipe International, find themselves in, and may or may not have been coming to their aid.
For the bankrupt media groups of Ireland and Britain have indeed destroyed the reputation of deceased broadcaster Jimmy Savile.
But people still think THEY are the scum.
I have a question.
For the police officer.
Sir.
Have you at any time in your life, ever accepted financial inducements from the Daily Mirror, and or Rupert Murdock, and or the other bankrupt viewerless readerless media groups of Ireland and Britain?
There was no motive for the Daily Mirror's crime beyond yet another pathetic attempt to inflate its dying readership.
The only mistake that the Daily Mirror's slanderous staff and editors made in labelling a British comedian as a racist, was that they chose a still living comedian who was alive enough at least to defend his reputation in open court.
The allegations lasted a full five seconds under cross examination.
Funny thing fairness.
Funny thing the truth.
Hilarious no.
It was also interesting to note that the Daily Mirror, the Daily Mail, and Judge Rupert Murdock's super soaraway nudy pix publishing phone sex lines trafficking citizens phones tapping police briging News International titles, gave prominence to what they callled police claims that their current target for ruination, the deceased broadcaster Jimmy Savile, may have been "the most prolific paedophile in British history."
May have been.
No need for a trial then, eh?
It emerged later that there was no such police statement on the matter.
There was a statement from an individual policeman Superintendant Peter Snodgrass, who, in trahaising the justice, truth and the law by making his comment, may or may not have understood the nature of the dilemma that the Daily Mirror, the Daily Mail, the utterly decrepit Independent Newspapers group in Ireland, along with Judge Rupert Murdock's Arsewipe International, find themselves in, and may or may not have been coming to their aid.
For the bankrupt media groups of Ireland and Britain have indeed destroyed the reputation of deceased broadcaster Jimmy Savile.
But people still think THEY are the scum.
I have a question.
For the police officer.
Sir.
Have you at any time in your life, ever accepted financial inducements from the Daily Mirror, and or Rupert Murdock, and or the other bankrupt viewerless readerless media groups of Ireland and Britain?
posted by heelers | 10:14 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home