another stunning performance from judge liberal

Judge Liberal and Jury Liberal have between them just about managed to convict a man of something they call manslaughter for staving in a woman's head with a brick.

The woman was married to the man who murdered her.

Or manslaughtered her as the Liberals would have it.

The Jury (twelve good liberals and true) concluded that the prosecution had failed to prove he actually intended to kill her.

So no murder conviction.

Just manslaughter.

It's hard to know what a murderer has to do in this country to actually get convicted of murder.

Hey Liberals.

The clue is in the bit where he staved in her head with the brick.

The Daily Mail dedicated twelve full pages to this case yesterday.

One of their page long articles asserted that the general public is fascinated by the case.

No.

We just want the murderer convicted of murder that's all.

That's the beginning and end of public interest in this matter.

Nobody is reading the Daily Mail's salacious sexualised expose style reportage.

You know folks I really do think the Daily Mail is overestimating the amount of public interest in the Daily Mail's attempts to turn a woman's murder into entertainment.

I just have a feeling.

(Copy this to all hacks.)

Meanwhile in another case, a second Judge Liberal, a certain Peter Charlton, made great play this week of dishing out five life sentences for various violations committed by a rapist against a young family.

Judge Charlton said: "I never want to see him released."

Yeah Liberal.

Neither does anyone else.

But why then did you issue an order that your dramatic showboating life sentences should run concurrently?

Concurrently means the five life sentences will all be served at the same time.

In other words, they're just one life sentence.

The rapist could have been violating all night long and he wouldn't have incurred any extra penalties.

Well, he'll know the next time.

Eh Liberal?

In an Irish prison one life sentence means the rapist will be out in six years.