fifty billion dollars worth of journalism

Questions That You Won't Hear On CNN or Sky News...

**************

A Japanese oil tanker was caught in an explosion at an Arabian sea port last week.

Authorities from the United Arab Emirates, in whose waters the incident occurred, claimed that there had been a gas explosion on the ship.

Film footage of the hull of the Japanese ship shows a large inward dent in the ironwork.

This indicates fairly conclusively that the explosion occurred outside the vessel.

Japanese news channels asserted that all interior damage to the ship showed a similar pattern.

Material and detritus inside the ship had been blown inwards by an explosion from outside.

There was no evidence of fragments from the ship being dispersed outward as would happen if the detonation had occurred somewhere on board.

The United Arab Emirates authorities later suggested that the ship had collided with another vessel.

The Japanese insist that no collision took place and that all evidence at the scene points to an explosion directed against the oil tanker.

Japanese reporters noted that the ship contained no internal gas supply or gas powered items.

You could be forgiven gentle readers for being unaware of the above information.

None of the main western news organisations gave it any prominence whatsoever.

But it is a cosmically important news story.

Listen folks.

Here is the news.

The explosion against the hull of a Japanese tanker in a United Arab Emirates sea port on Thursday, was an Al Qaeda terrorist attack.

Al Qaeda is now targeting oil tankers with a view to creating environmental disasters.

Al Qaeda was attempting to create an oil spillage by detonating explosives off the Japanese ship's hull.

There is no mystery.

Now.

It is clear that since Al Qaeda is trying to create environmental disasters while preserving for itself plausible deniability, we must ask ourselves whether any other environmental disasters have occurred recently in unexplained circumstances.

And lo!

Three months ago a British Petroleum oil rig was blown to kingdom come in the gulf of Mexico, precipitating one of the greatest oil spills ever.

And a month ago a mysterious explosion at an oil facility in China caused a slightly smaller, but serious enough, oil spill there.

And a month ago in Russia there was a huge "unexplained" explosion at a hydrolectric dam which killed at least 60 people.

What have American and China and Russia got in common?

Yes.

Al Qaeda muslims are at war with all of them.

Bear this in mind.

Al Qaeda is no longer looking for the credit for every bit of chaos or for every mass murder it engineers.

Al Qaeda hasn't exactly enjoyed the sensation of getting its arse kicked by the American army all around Afghanistan and Iraq this past ten years.

And Al Qaeda is cognisant that there's always the risk the Americans will get rid of their present Clown In Chief and elect another President of the calibre of George Bush.

One who actually works for a living.

So Al Qaeda has learned.

When creating environmental disasters for the west or inflicting mass murder on humanity it is safer to do so by proxy.

Much safer than actually taking credit for its own vileness and thereby exposing itself to retribution.

I have seen no list of the names of the eleven people killed in the explosion at the British Petroleum oil rig in the gulf of Mexico.

I want to see those names because I want to know if there were muslims on board.

I want to know if investigators have identified any potential security risk among the staff on board that rig, the ones who were killed and the ones who survived, and among other staff, that is anyone in British Petroleum with a knowledge of the rig's logistics and location and/or access to same.

I want to know if investigators have bothered looking for such security risks.

I want to know if investigators have yet identified the precise cause of the explosion.

I want to know where exactly the explosion occurred.

And finally and most importantly.

Was the explosion on British Petroleum's oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico caused by Al Qaeda saboteurs?

Or was it just an unexplained external explosion?

Those are questions you'll never hear on CNN or Sky News or NBC, or CBS, or ABC, or Channel Four, or the BBC, or in the pages of the Guardian, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Irish Times et al. (Particularly Al. He's useless.)

And let's face it, Barack Obama's homeland security apparatus is probably never going to go looking for a terrorist connection.

That's not the sort of thing Barack's people are interested in.

Remember the Fort Hood massacre?

The blood of the victims wasn't yet dry before Barack's people were telling us that an Al Qaeda murderer called Hassan Malik slaughtered more than a dozen soldiers and an unborn baby at a military base because poor little Hassan Malik had post traumatic stress disorder.

Remember the Al Qaeda attempt to blow up Times Square?

The Muslims wanted to avenge themselves on a cartoon called South Park which they didn't like and whose distributor Viacom has offices at Times Square.

As part of a damage limitation exercise Barack's people were telling us the night of that mass murder attempt (thankfully unsuccessful) that the bomber was a white man.

Mayor Bloomberg of New York went on air to inform us that the bomb was "amateurish," ie not up to the usual high standards Mayor Bloomberg expects from Islamist bombs.

Bloomberg also reiterated the nonsense lie that the police were looking for a white man.

Ain't nobody ever called Al Qaeda assassin Faisal Islam white before.

He's been called many things by many people.

But not white.

And so it goes on.

Al Qaeda is benefiting from the vapid posturings of an appeaserish hippy president to retrench and restrategise for its long war.

Barack's draw down of troops in Iraq and his announcement of a withdrawal timetable, has allowed Al Qaeda and its Iranian associates, to refocus their attentions on Afghanistan.

Barack's release of terrorists from Guantanamo Bay has allowed Al Qaeda to reclaim its best operatives.

Barack's dithering over the allocation of extra troops for Afghanistan has given Al Qaeda a sure sense of his weakness and a real scent of victory.

You know my analysis.

Al Qaeda bombed that Japanese tanker last week.

Al Qaeda has been bombing hydroelectric dams in Russia.

There is a significant possibility Al Qaeda bombed the British Petroleum oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico along with the oil facilities in southern China.

Al Qaeda is without doubt attempting to instigate environmental disasters as a new part of its ongoing strategy.

The Second World Jihad War is at hand.

 

Footnote: As we go to press, news has broken of another attack on a hydrolectric facility in Russia. This time Al Qaeda came out into the open. Two Muslim attackers were killed by Russian security personnel.