the reputation of the supersoaraway phone tapping police bribing politician subverting naked lady publishing sun newspaper versus jimmy savile

The Sun newspaper this week asserted that Jimmy Savile was a suspect in the murders committed by the Yorkshire Ripper and his friends in the 1970's and 1980's.
The source cited by the Sun for its claim was none other than a former actress called Nikki whose most notable work up to now was in providing the female interest on a salacious television comedy programme called The Benny Hill Show.
Nikki's statement was as follows: "I once met a South African doctor who has since died and who told me that the police got him to make a plaster cast of Jimmy Savile's teeth because he said they suspected Jimmy Savile of the Yorkshire Ripper murders."
Hmmm.
Anybody out there convinced that this is genuine testimony?
Should we be disquieted that the super soaraway bankrupt Sun paid her for her statement?
Should we care that bankrupt newspapers have devised a new business model for themselves in ruining the reputations of deceased celebrities whose supposed promiscuity they had formerly lionised?
The Sun and Sky News (both owned by Judge Rupert Murdock) continue to claim that the Savile family now accepts the allegations of sex abuse against Jimmy Savile.
This is another deliberately misleading piece of agit prop.
The family have accepted no such thing.
A nephew of Jimmy Savile's, who does not speak for the family, has continued to say what he has said from Day One, in return for financial inducements from various newspapers, that he personally believes his uncle was guilty.
Nobody except this nephew has spoken to the media from the Savile family.
And finally Esther.
The Sun, Sky News and other bankrupt media groups involved in trying to promote themselves via the destruction of Jimmy Savile, have been implying that Jimmy Savile was involved in abuse at the Haut La Garenne children's home on the island of Jersey.
This case is close to my heart.
I myself  believe a devil worship ring abused and murdered children at Haut La Garenne for many decades.
I have attempted in a modest way to focus public attention on the story.
As part of their anti Jimmy Savile campaign the Sun and other newspapers have been selectively quoting Alan Harper one of the police investigators in the Jersey case.
I consider Alan Harper to be an honorable man.
He was in my view taken off the Jersey case for going after the truth in too determined a manner.
But the Sun and friends are disingenuous in quoting Mr Harper.
Mr Harper's only statement vis a vis Jimmy Savile appears to be one in which Mr Harper clearly stated there was insufficient evidence at Haut La Garenne to charge Jimmy Savile with anything.
This statement is being presented by the Sun and co in such a way as to appear to impute guilt towards Jimmy Savile.
These bankrupt newspaper groups and their appalling neo feudalist parvenu bosses (Big shout out to you Rupert) need Jimmy Savile to be guilty more than they need the truth to be told.
They are judges of nothing.
Fight them.