the trump dilemma

There is significant evidence of widespread electoral fraud in this month's Presidential election in the USA.

I am suggesting that the election was stolen from Donald Trump.

The methodologies for the fraud began to become apparent in the months before the vote with opinion polls vastly overstating support for Joe Biden, and continued via systemic early media declarations of States for Biden on election night to create an appearance of momentum for Biden and suppress the Trump vote, and culminated late the same evening in the synchronous abandoment of vote counts in several States to allow for the manufacture of phantom votes for Biden in order to overturn overwhelming Trump leads.

The dilemma for Mr Trump is that those methods have been used before in attempts to cheat Presidents he may not wish to be seen comparing himself to.

In 1960, the Democrats are reputed to have stolen the Presidential election, cheating a young Richard Nixon out of his rightful victory on behalf of John F Kennedy.

I say "reputed to have stolen" because we always have to consider the vested interests of communists, mafias, and other mischief makers in shaking public confidence in every election we hold.

Nonetheless.

The gambit was purportedly engineered through the late night gerrymandering of results in a single county of a single State.

On the whims of history, Mr Nixon's name has since become a dirty word in American politics so it is unlikely that Trump staffers will cite his experiences in 1960 in arguing that the present election was stolen.

The ruination of Richard Nixon's reputation has entered folklore as his just deserts for some purportedly criminal behaviour by staffers of his who in the early 1970s attempted to surreptitiously insert recording equipment in a Democratic Party office.

In truth Nixon was brought down by a persistent media campaign of slander which stampeded his own party away from him.

They've been trying to do precisely the same thing to Trump with an identical range of dirty tricks right up to their use of an essentially frivolous impeachment process to create an aura of criminality around the President.

Remember the Dems only threatened Nixon with immpeachment but actually have impeached President Trump. The threat was enough to drive Nixon from office but this time the American people weren't buying and the impeachment of Trump was widely considered a politicised legalistic bums' rush Democratic Party scam too far.

Still Trump's people are not inclined to adopt a media strategy of comparing themselves with Nixon.

When Nixon did win an election in 1968 and again overwhlemingly in 1972 the media and the Democratic Party used smear tactics to discredit him suggesting repeatedly just as they have done with Trump, that Mr Nixon was mentally unstable.

The dilemma remains. How can Trump show how this game is presently being orchestrated without bracketing himself with President Nixon?

Another aspect of the Trump dilemma in addressing these methodoligies of electoral fraud, is the clear analogy between what has been done to him and what was attempted with George W Bush in the year 2000.

Early on election ngiht 2000, the media networks began calling Florida for Al Gore. This was done while the Republican strongholds of Florida were still voting. Since the populace had been told that Bush couldn't win without Florida, declaring Florida decided for Gore, meant the Bush vote was collapsed both in the still voting Republican panhandle areas of Florida and across the United States of America.

Bush still won but this is how the coup was attempted. The intention was to collapse the Bush vote and bring some close run States within stealing distance.

On election night this month, Fox News early on announced Arizona for Joe Biden. This is one of the States whose results are the subject of allegations of fraud. None of the other major networks called Arizona for Biden.

Left wing commentator Michael Moore claimed twenty years ago when trying to refute notions of an attempted Democratic Party coup against George Bush implicit in the early Florida declaration, that it was in fact the supposedly Republican Party sympathising Fox News which first called the State wrongly for Gore. Michael Moore also tried to diminish the notion that an orchestrated fraud was in place using an early declarations methodology by claiming that the Fox News announcment had been made by a cousin of Mr Bush's who worked at the network. Of course Mr Bush's cousin may have read out such an announcement. There is no possibility that he made the call.

So for Trump again we have the dilemma of whether or not he wishes to compare his situation with that of a President whom he has opportunistically vilified particularly with regard to what I call Mr Bush's heroic and necessary decisive interventions against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and the Saddam Hussein murderocracy in Iraq.

Just so's you know where I stand folks.

There is another dilemma for President Donald Trump involving the fate of yet another putative President from the recent past..

Some of us assert that Mr Trump is this year being robbed of the Presidency through electoral fraud.

Some of us on the lunatic fringe of conspiracy theorists are also suggesting a paradigm involving electoral fraud perpetrators acting on Mr Trump's own behalf or at least to his benefit using exactly the same methodology four yeas ago to rob the Presidency from Hillary Clinton.

It's grim up t'western civilisation.