You could be forgiven for thinking that various national newspapers in the Republic of Ireland have come down with schizophrenia in their reportage of the most recent cosmically variegated public posturings of Archbishop Diarmuid Martin.
First up, I ask you to consider the Archy reportage in the Daily Mail, whose Irish edition has debts to idiot banks of around a hundred million dollars (Not to be confused with its British edition whose debts are above a billion dollars).
The Daily Mail today described Archbishop Diarmuid Martin as speaking out
in defence of the Vatican's robust response to Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny's criticisms and to criticisms contained in the recently released Judicial investigation of the Catholic Church's handling of child abuse cases, styled by its authors the Cloyne report.
By the way you should know that I believe Enda Kenny's criticisms of the Vatican were the most shameful Nazified faux popularist ranting in the history of our country.
I consider the Cloyne report to be a tendentiously malign manipulation of the truth put together by atheistic Judges intended solely to contrive, manufacture and inflict spurious blame on the Church for its handling of sex abuse cases where a fair minded person would conclude no such blame exists.
Just so's you know where I stand.
But here's the rub.
Archy has made a speech in which once again he accorded himself the status of leader of the Catholic Church in Ireland.
Archy isn't the leader of the Catholic Church in Ireland.
The leader of the Catholic Church in Ireland is Cardinal Sean Brady and he is the only man here entitled to speak for us.
Archy is a regional Bishop with no authority to speak for the whole Church whatsover.
Archy's apparent challenge to our bigoted Prime Minister Enda Kenny was merely a statement of the bleedin obvious.
When Enda Kenny claimed the Vatican had impeded sex abuse investigations in Ireland, Kenny was telling a massive falsehood.
A falsehood that Kenny cannot even begin to substantiate.
Archy's enumeration of this fact was not in fact a defence of the Vatican.
It was in fact nothing more than a blatent attempt to promote Archy's own profile, to ingratiate himself among Bishops and priests and a growing number of the faithful, who openly despise him as a liberal leftist infiltrating traitor intent on remaking the Church in his own image.
Hilarious no!
Yet the Anti Catholic Daily Mail was so incensed by Archy's faux loyalty to the ancient Church that it ran a blazing editorial excoriating him headlined: "What Would Jesus Do!"
I suppose folks when the Daily Mail pretends to know the mind of the Messiah, we must genuinely be close to the end of the world.
In any case I have my doubts that Archy has ever in his life spoken out in defence of our ancient, beautiful and true religion without an ulterior motive.
The present speech included.
That's not his bag.
I'd say the Daily Mail were seeing what they wanted to see and coming up with total fiction as per usual.
And lo.
Archy's anti Catholic allies in Independent Newspapers had a completely different take on exactly the same speech.
For also earlier today, the Sunday Independent (Independent Newspapers' net indebtedness to idiot banking creditors is above two billion dollars by the by) reported that Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has been "speaking out against a secret cabal in the Catholic Church which refuses to protect children from child abusers."
Now that sounds more like the Archy we know.
Of the two anti Catholic newspaper groups, my money is on the Sunday Independent to have come closer than the Daily Mail to reporting the tone and import of what Archy actually said.
After all the Sunday Independent and its associated titles have been working closely with Archy to try and force a generation of Bishops from office through the contrivance of arbitrary and false claims against them, to wit that by attempting to handle sex abuse cases discreetly or in accordance with best practice pyschiatric and legal advice at the time, they had been deliberately concealing and facilitating sex abuse.
Let's be clear.
The Anti Catholic Daily Mail claims Archbishop Diarmuid Martin is defending the church and the Anti Catholic Daily Mail then sneers at him for doing so.
And the Anti Catholic Sunday Independent, reporting precisely the same speech by Archy, claims Archbishop Diarmuid Martin is heroically defying institutional Catholicism to warn of an evil cabal lurking within the Church which needs to be driven out, conveniently enough, in accordance with the Sunday Independent and Archy's own wishes.
I'd say the cabal business is closer to Archy's style.
Hear me gentle travellers of the internet.
Having considered the assessments of Archy emanating from the Anti Catholic Daily Mail which this evening is pretending to despise him, and from the Anti Catholic Sunday Independent which continues to be his greatest cheerleader, finally I say, you may like to consider my own humble assessment of the great man.
It goes something like this.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin is a soviet era infiltrator of the Catholic Church seeking to remake the Church in his own image.
As the son of radical Northern Ireland parents he was born into a vestigially culturally Catholic millieu.
His upbringing was nonetheless Marxian.
His brother Seamus, former political editor of the ultra leftist Anti Catholic Irish Times, was a KGB agent who spent the Cold War rooting for the Russians.
Seamus is spending his retirement in palatial splendour in Paris.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's infiltration of the Church began with, and was a part of, a major Soviet infiltration operation directed against the Catholic Church in Poland, Austria, France, Italy and other countries.
Soviet era infiltrators working as Bishops have been publicly exposed in many of those countries following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has attempted to ruin any Bishop or Cardinal who dared to resist his attempted hijacking of the Irish Catholic Church.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has attempted to blackmail Cardinal Sean Brady into assisting him with the enforced ouster of a generation of Bishops.
When Cardinal Brady jumped ship and refused to back Arcbishop Diarmuid Martin at a meeting with the Pope in Rome, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's Media allies unleashed an immediate newspaper campaign claiming falsely that Cardinal Brady had covered up a sex abuse case while a young priest.
This attempt to ruin Cardinal Brady was based on the malign and manipulative interpretation of the fact that as a young priest Cardinal Brady had been clerk at a meeting where evidence was taken from two sex abuse victims and as part of the procedures at that meeting he had sworn the two victims to secrecy.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's Media allies also targeted the Pope following Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's failed attempt to stampede the Pope into firing twenty Irish Bishops.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's Media allies targeted the Pope by focussing on the handling of an old sex abuse case that had occurred in the German jurisdiction where the Pope had once been a Bishop.
Both the Media campaign against Cardinal Brady and the Media campaign against the Pope, had been prepared by Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's Media allies well in advance of the Papal meeting at which Archbishop Diarmuid Martin blatently and maliciously attempted and failed to contrive and promulgate guilt about their handling of sex abuse cases for a generation of decent, noble, honorable, self sacrificing Bishops who had never done anything wrong in their lives except get in the way of Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's dark vision for our ancient Church.
All this is sovietism writ large.
I ask you folks.
If Archbishop Diarmuid Martin is not what I say he is, why on earth would the most virulently anti Catholic Media organisations, RTE, Independent Newspapers, and the Irish Times, so consistently sing his praises?
These people have spent forty years trying to erase the Catholic Church from our nation.
Yet they love Archy.
There's a clue there somewhere.
Get this.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has been colluding with atheistic (pseudo)humanist power brokers lurking in the shadows of the upper echolons of Irish society.
Archbishop Diarmuid has been colluding with ultra leftist Media figures who propagandise their Anti Catholic agendas in plain view in the Irish Times and Independent Newspapers and in the State run Stalinist broadcaster RTE.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has attempted to preempt the modest criticisms arising from this blog by using those very criticisms to describe his own critics.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin lifted the phrase "there are people trying to remake the Catholic Church in their own image," from this blog where I had applied it to him.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin lifted the notion of "secret cabals" from this blog where I had suggested he was colluding with shadowy atheistic (pseudo)humanist elements within the Civil Service, the Judiciary, Parliament and the Media, in an attempt to destroy the Catholic Church.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's attempt to turn the truth on its head and use it as a cudgel on his enemies is also an old soviet tactic.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's attempt to throw twenty bishops under the bus so that he could then control the Church by appointing their successors is yet another old soviet trick.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's use of the Irish Times and Independent Newspapers to discredit both the Pope and Cardinal Sean Brady by falsely labelling them concealers of child abuse is an old soviet trick.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's attempt to remove from Bishops the right to speak for themselves in their own defence is an old soviet trick.
Archbishop Diarmuid Martin's most recent speech in which he poses as someone defending the Church while at the same time giving his Media accolytes new ammunition to undermine it, is an old soviet trick.
Well folks.
Who do you believe?
The Irish Times?
The Daily Mail?
The Sunday Independent?
Or James Healy?
The bankrupt Bolshevicks?
The bankrupt whoremasters?
The bankrupt idolators of Tony O'Reilly?
Or me?
