vincent browne versus the israelis

Vincent Browne (Irish broadcaster): "Israel is the cancer in foreign affairs. It polarises the Islamic community of the world against the rest of the world... They stole the land from the Arabs."

James Healy: "I disagree with Vincent Browne in his analysis of this matter. He states that the existence of the State of Israel explains the alienation of Muslims from the rest of humanity.  This statement does not stand up to scrutiny. I put it to you gentle readers, that Muslims all over the world are inflicting terror on countries that have given them a home and that the reasons for this non stop terrorism against the rest of humanity relate solely to dysfunctions arising endogenously within Islamic culture, tradition and polity. The psycho pathology of Islam is Islam. Muslims are committing mass murders against the rest of humanity because of the grotesque barbarism of the Muslim religion and culture, and because of Muslims' own massive inferiority complex towards every other segment of human society. The reasons for the various Muslim Jihad Wars unfolding across the planet earth are entirely unrelated to the existence of the State of Israel. The Muslim Jihad War against Russia is an attempt by Muslims to terrorise Russia into allowing the secession of Chechnya and other southern Russian republics. There is no link, and never has been any link, to the State of Israel in the excuses Muslims offer for murdering Russians. In the past ten years, Muslim Jihadis have repeatedly downed Russian passenger jets. Muslims have murdered theatre goers in Moscow. Muslims have blown up the Saint Petersburg Express train. Muslims have slaughtered 150 children in a Russian school in the town of Beslan. This mayhem has been unleashed against Russia solely because Muslims wish to conquer Russia. There is no other external reason. Now look at Muslim behaviour vis a vis India, sometimes styled the world's most populous democracy. The Muslim Jihad War against India is taking place simply because Muslims wish to detach Kashmir and other regions of India from Indian rule. The Muslim Jihad against India over the past ten years has included attacks on airports, blowing up trains, shooting 187 people to death in the streets of Bombay, and murdering 14 Hindu parliamentarians as they entered the Indian parliament. I put it to you gentle friends (and to you Mr Browne) that the psychopathy of Muslim behaviour in India has found its expression in mass murder without any reference to the Palestinian situation. It is simply and solely another Muslim Jihad against people who have allowed Muslims to live among them. Similarly the Muslim Jihad War against China has unfolded with classic Muslim brutality for reasons relating exclusively to Muslims' relationship to the Chinese government, and not as could only be delusionally asserted by Mr Browne or anyone else, because of anything to do with Israel. Muslims in China are attempting to secede the vast region of Xinjiang Uigher from Chinese rule. This is their sole justification for murdering Chinese people whenever the urge takes them. The Muslim Jihad War in China is less well reported than the other Muslim Jihads worldwide which are themselves chronically under reported. Nonetheless we know that in the past ten years, Muslims attempting to terrorise China, have favoured decapitation, ie cutting people's heads off, as a way of expressing their religious convictions at the expense of the people who live along side them. In the Philippines the Muslim Jihad War has had a high body count for more than a century. The Muslims of the Philippines commit mass murder on a regular basis in an attempt to secede the Mindanao island group from the rest of the Philippines. The favoured terrorist outrage used by Muslims in the Philippines is to sink passenger ferry boats. This gives them a regular kill tally of about 200 people a time. These attacks are all but unreported in the Free World. Still restricting our considerations to the last ten years, it is interesting to note that the Muslim Jihad War against Thailand has killed more than five thousand Thais in just the past decade and driven many many thousands more from their homes. There is no Israeli connection to the ongoing Muslim attempts to detach Thailand's southern provinces from Thailand. It is just another Jihad, plain and simple and plainly and simply murderous. The Muslim Jihad Wars in Africa are similarly local in nature and from a rational point of view absolutely unconnected to the existence of the State of Israel. The church burnings orchestrated by Muslims in Nigeria and Kenya are merely the latest Muslim attempts to extend their rule into two countries that have never in history bowed to them. Even in Europe Muslim Jihadi's have in the past twenty years successfully seceded regions from two formerly non Muslim European countries which were foolish enough to allow Muslims to live in them. Northern Cyprus has been detached from Cyprus. Kosovo has been detached from Serbia. Those most malign and murderous Muslims of Cyprus and Kosovo have never for a second pretended their murderousness was caused by Israel. The Muslims of Cyprus and Kosovo sensed a moment of weakness in the countries that had foolishly given them a place to live. And they skewered those countries just for the hell of it. Hell being the operative word. The Jihad War in Western Europe is also opportunistic and in accord with historic Muslim empire building. From 2005 Muslims in France have regularly torched the suburbs of French cities as they probe the limits of tolerance in a secular western society, time and time again, testing what they can get away. The Muslim who stabbed the Mayor of Paris can hardly have been frustrated by that gentleman's non existent position on the Israeli Palestine conflict. The Muslim youths who inflict gang rape on French women can hardly be said to be inspired by their racist Islamic detestation of the State of Israel. The Muslims of Paris commit gang rapes because up to now they've been let away with it. And because historically women in those parts of the world where Islam has been the prevailing power, have a value something below your average worthless chattel. The Muslims of the Netherlands who murdered the Netherlands Prime Minister In Waiting Pym Fortyn and the Dutch film director Theo Van Gogh, did so in a clear attempt to terrorise the Netherlands into submission to Islam. Surely even the self promoting Mr Brown (currently negotiating a new pay agreement for himself at the Irish broadcaster TV3) couldn't drag the Israelis into his analysis of those particular slaughters. On top of all this I would also like to suggest that Al Qaeda, far from being a response to the Palestinian situation, is more correctly understood as a continuance of the ancient Muslim cult of the assassins. This cult has prevented the emergence of any moderate Muslim polity or governance for 1500 years. I would ask you gentle readers (and you Mr Browne) to look at countries with majority Muslim populations. Most of them exist in a state of permanent warfare against their own (mostly Muslim) populaces along with an even more invidiously racist oppression of any minorities who live in their midst. On October 29th 2005, Muslims in Indonesia beheaded three little school girls on their way to school. The justification claimed by the Muslim murderers of those school girls was that the little girls were Christian. No Israeli component can be ascribed to these and thousands of similar Muslim child murders around the globe, by any stretch of Vincent Brown's or anyone else's imagination. Nor do the repeated acid blindings by Muslims of schoolgirls in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan as punishment to the little girls for daring to seek an education have any possible relationship to the State of Israel. The Pakistani form of divorce, staging an accident where the wife is burnt to death at a cooking stove, is similarly unrelated to Jewish culture and history. I say it again. It arises solely from the barbarism that is Islam. Surely this sort of Muslim psychopathy in the rulership by Muslims of those countries cursed with majority Muslim populations, can in no way be laid at the door of the State of Israel. Your reasoning Mr Browne does not become you. As for your assertion that Israel was build on land stolen from the Arabs, all I can say is that I am profoundly convinced you are wrong. Any assertion of theft is contingent upon  a very late arrival in human history. Historically, Mr Browne, I would suggest those lands are the home of the holy people. (Hint: Not the head hackers.) And I would suggest that the reason Muslim Arabs keep losing their permanent psycho war against the existence of both  the State of Israel and the Jewish people, is because those Muslim Arabs are so busy killing anyone and everyone they feel like killing for any and every reason they randomly choose to ascribe to their predilection for killing, that neither the Muslim Arabs nor you Mr Browne are capable of hearing over the sounds of their atrocities and your justifications for their atrocities, what God is telling you. You will never win. The State of Israel will never be overthrown. The Jewish people will never be destroyed. The State of Israel and the Jewish people have been chosen since before time to make the will of God known to the nations."

remembrance of things past

October sunshine on the universe.
Ireland's greatest living poet is standing waiting to cross the road at the traffic lights in Newbridge.
He is moderately bemused to be hailed jovially by a certain Ray Baines.
Ray spent some decades on the staff of the Leinster Leader as an ads seller.
He has since retired.
And now.
Ray Baines, formerly of the Leinster Leader advertising department is hailing me from his bicycle.
"They're nearly gone James."
"Who?"
"The Leinster Leader. It's nearly finished."
"Nah Ray. They're still publishing. They're still getting advertising."
"Those aren't paid ads. They're giving the ads away."
He moved off into traffic.
I stood there.
The ghost of a smile crossed my handsome preraphaelite features.

splashings

in the pool of evening
quick silver
ripples widening
forever

cold water thing
risen to exult
in some unthinking imagining
ordinary is wonder enough

what do fishes dream

the number of the muslims

"So it's not merely that there;s a global jihad lurking within this religion, but that the religion itself is a political project - and in fact an imperial project - in a way that modern Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism, are not. Futhermore, this particular religion is historically a somewhat bloodthirsty faith in which whatever's your bag violence wise can almost certainly be justified. And yes, Christianity has had its blood drenched moments, but the Spanish Inquisition, which remains a by word for theocratic violence, killed fewer people in a century and a half than the jihad does in a typical year."
Page 62, Mark Steyn, AMERICA ALONE THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT, published 2006 by Regnery Publishing.

*******

Footnote: The Irish government now admits in its latest census data, whose figures date from 2011, that there are officially 60,000 Muslims in Ireland. I seem to remember the Irish Times claiming there might be approximately 30,000. The real present day figure far exceeds 100,000. We are in a lot of trouble. But if we expel them, they can wage all the jihad they like in Arabia, and it's not going to matter. It only matters if we let them live here with us. Heelers.

an open letter to david quinn token catholic at the anti catholic irish independent newspaper

Quinn.
You wrote recently in the anti Catholic Irish Independent newspaper that some individuals who had posted a video on the Youtube website assessing some of the more ludicrous behaviours of followers of the prophet Muhammed, were merely trouble makers.
Your assessment of the individuals seems to have been based on nothing more than the fact that in response to their video on the Youtube website, Muslims all over the world rioted and killed innocent people.
So you David Quinn, in your wisdom, have concluded that the individuals who posted the video on Youtube (both of whom have far more direct experience of Muslims than you have had) are trouble makers simply because in warning about the violent and psychotic tendencies of Muslims, they found themselves used by Muslims as one of those periodic excuses that Muslims like to cite, for Muslims' recurrent rapes, murders, riots and sundry other atrocities worldwide.
(The rapes reference relates in particular to the recent case in France where a liberal court released gang rapist Muslims into the community with a slap on the wrist for torturing women and raping them half to death as part of a rites of passage rape ritual that Muslim males in France use called La Tournante.)
Tell me Quinn.
Muslims in Pakistan has just shot and wounded a 14 year old girl called Malia Iussufzai.
They shot her in the head Quinn.
They shot some of her friends too as they tried to get at her.
Her crime was to advocate on her own internet blog in favour of education for girls.
She has been driven from Pakistan and will probably never return home.
Pakistan is a Muslim country which has enough money to build a massive arsenal of nuclear weapons but can't afford to build flood defences for the annual monsoons which devastate the country.
During last year's flood which may have killed a few hundred Pakistanis, United Nations Secretary General Banki Moon falsely and incompetently claimed that the floods in Pakistan were "the worst natural disaster in human history," and went on to direct billions of dollars of international funding to help the Muslims of Pakistan maintain their nuclear missiles while building a grand total of nought flood defences.
This misplaced funding from the international community amounts to cruel and unusual punishment for the children and people of Pakistan.
Because international aid money moderates the suffering of the people of Pakistan just enough, so that the monstrous Islamist Muslims who enslave them can continue to say: "Look! Life with us ain't so bad."
Tell me Quinn.
Tell me you evil Tony O'Reilly worshipping  bast--d.
Is Malia Iussufzai just another trouble maker?
James Healy

the trial of jimmy savile by the daily mirror judge rupert murdock presiding

It was interesting to note that the Daily Mirror was this week fined 60,000 pounds for falsely, maliciously and malignly labelling a British comedian as a racist.
There was no motive for the Daily Mirror's crime beyond yet another pathetic attempt to inflate its dying readership.
The only mistake that the Daily Mirror's slanderous staff and editors made in labelling a British comedian as a racist, was that they chose a still living comedian who was alive enough at least to defend his reputation in open court.
The allegations lasted a full five seconds under cross examination.
Funny thing fairness.
Funny thing the truth.
Hilarious no.
It was also interesting to note that the Daily Mirror, the Daily Mail, and Judge Rupert Murdock's super soaraway nudy pix publishing phone sex lines trafficking citizens phones tapping police briging News International titles, gave prominence to what they callled police claims that their current target for ruination, the deceased broadcaster Jimmy Savile, may have been "the most prolific paedophile in British history."
May have been.
No need for a trial then, eh?
It emerged later that there was no such police statement on the matter.
There was a statement from an individual policeman Superintendant Peter Snodgrass, who, in trahaising the justice, truth and the law by making his comment, may or may not have understood the nature of the dilemma that the Daily Mirror, the Daily Mail, the utterly decrepit Independent Newspapers group in Ireland, along with Judge Rupert Murdock's Arsewipe International, find themselves in, and may or may not have been coming to their aid.
For the bankrupt media groups of Ireland and Britain have indeed destroyed the reputation of deceased broadcaster Jimmy Savile.
But people still think THEY are the scum.
I have a question.
For the police officer.
Sir.
Have you at any time in your life, ever accepted financial inducements from the Daily Mirror, and or Rupert Murdock, and or the other bankrupt viewerless readerless media groups of Ireland and Britain?

watching the defectives

The bankrupt anti Catholic Irish Independent newspaper group continues its new and ever more surrealistic corporate strategy wherewith it seeks to reinvent itself as a newspaper in good standing with the ancient, beautiful and true Catholic Church.
After forty years championing the most bigoted atheistic whoredom (Hedonism surely? - Ed note), it's all change at Tony O'Reilly's dessicated rag.
So this is how they're going to play it.
The abortion age, the kulturkampf against the Church, the sex age, rise of the rackateers, Fianna Fail, Fine Gael Labour Party kleptocracy, none of it had a cause.
Ireland's is burning.
And now the Irish Independent wants to pretend to be Catholic.
I am disinclined to allow them to get away with it.
Of course among the three (Twee surely? - Ed note) faux pro Catholic articles the Irish Independent now publishes daily, it also always publishes an exculpatory article, ie one designed to maintain its own credibility for its previous malignly anti Catholic stance through self congratulatory quotations from some fake Catholic who is willing to sign up for such propaganda work.
These exculpatory articles are meant to allay the inherent contradictions in Independent Newspapers new strategy of posing Catholic.
The contradictions would become untenable if Independent Newspapers had any reader with a memory span of more than five minutes.
Today's edition carried a splash of stories designed to promulgate the above mentioned utterly false notion that Independent Newspapers is now favourably disposed to our eternal glorious and perfect religion.
Firstly there was the exculpatory article, to remind us falsely that the Irish Independent had only reluctantly tried to sneer the Church out of existence in past, a double bluff story featuring former Irish President kleptocratic Fianna Fail socialist Mary MacAleese feigning Catholicism while reiterating the old Irish Independent inuendos alleging falsely prissily wearisomely and with pious zealous cretinous malignancy that the Church covered up child abuse.
It never gets old does it, Independent Newspapers?
I call the MacAleese Independent Newspapers accusation against the Church re its handling of sex abuse cases, false, cretinous, and malign, because the truth is that sex abuse has exploded across Ireland and the world and that the vast preponderance of cases (the cases abjectly concealed and ignored, by MacAleese and her leftist media allies) occur outside the Church and without any Catholic component.
So MacAleese is still showboating, still claiming to be Catholic, still providing Independent Newspapers with plausible deniability so that Independent Newspapers can conceal its culture war against the Church.
This in spite of the fact that 99.99 percent of sex abuse occurs without the involvement of any Catholic and is covered up by the media (who don't report the statistic or the fact), by the Judiciary (which facilitated Judge Brian Curtin with an early retirement and an acquittal after Judge Brian Curtin was caught paying to see children raped on the internet) , by the Health Boards (in whose care at least a dozen Irish children die mysteriously every year) and by our government (which has recently closed the Vatican Embassy and which same Irish government is refusing to compensate the vast majority of sex abuse victims who were abused in State Care claiming that if they give compensation to the vast majority of child abuse victims then Ireland will simply go bust. (Againnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.)
Hilariously, the above mentioned Irish Health Boards (famous for killing twelve kids a year, and at least 200 kids every ten years, pattycake government enquiries notwithstanding), yes those same murderous atheistic Irish Health Boards are commissioned by our government to draw up audits, official critiques no less, of the Catholic Church's policy's regarding interaction with children.
You couldn't make it up.
Ah yes.
Sex abuse victims are important to Mary MacAleese, the Irish Independent, the Health Boards and the government of Ireland.
But some sex victims are more important than others.
That is to say, the only sex abuse victims who are important and who are entilted to any semblance of justice, are the tiny minority of sex abuse victims who can be used as part of a liberal leftist culture war against the Catholic Church, why they are the most important of all.
The rest can go hang as far as the great humanitarian socialist Mary MacAleese and her creeping mercantilist neo feudal allies at Independent Newspapers are concerned.
(Neo feudal because Independent Newspapers is owned by two robber barons, the dying Tony O'Reilly and the young thruster goverment bribing mobile phone thief Denis O'Brien.)
But I digress.
The article about Mary MacAleese in today's Irish Independent is not typical of the Irish Independent's risible attempts to reinvent itself as a credible participant in Ireland's Catholic culture.
But it is a part of the same corporate strategy.
In this article, the Irish Independent seeks to sell us on the notion that socialist atheistic anti Catholic bigots can be loyal Catholics too.
If a thieving gypsy northern radical Fianna Fail atheistic bitch like Mary MacAleese can call herself Catholic, then why not Independent Newspapers?
Personally I'm not buying.
Several other articles appear in the Irish Independent today which are aimed at allowing the Irish Independent to pose Catholic in a more mainstream way.
There's a pattycake article about the Pope nominating new saints.
There's a quite pleasant article about the clean up underway after flooding at the Lourdes shrine in France.
Journalist Mark O'Regan seems to be a little confused about the Catholic Church's formal stance on such shrines however.
He maintains while trying not to offend anyone in his insincere anodyne pattycake style (cf Irish government enquiries) that "Catholics believe the Virgin Mary appeared" at Lourdes.
Ah yes.
Spare some pity for the liberal atheistic journos at Independent Scruffpapers who are suddenly being told to write articles favourable to the church for the first time in forty years.
The incompetent bast--ds.
Here is the news.
Catholics are not required to believe that the Virgin Mary has ever appeared at any shrine, Lourdes included.
The ancient beautiful and true Catholic Church recommends some claims of apparitions as being worthy of belief.
But since the time of our Lord, (I am referring to the time on earth of the Son of the Hebrew God, not Tony O'Reilly) no apparition has been made an article of Catholic Faith.
The Catholic Church has never insisted that Catholics believe in any apparition.
Some do believe.
Some keep an open mind.
Some think the apparitions are not genuine.
None of us are quarelling with the Church when we hold such views.
Another supposedly pro Catholic article, appears on page 21 of today's Irish Independent.
It is posited below an article on same sex marriage.
The reason it is hidden away in such a location, is because the article is about Father Oliver Brennan who two years ago was falsely accused of child abuse.
The blatent attempt by scoundrels to frame an innocent Catholic priest using fake allegations of child abuse doesn't exactly fit with the conventional Independent Newspapers narrative on such matters.
Father Brennan has been restored to ministry.
His name has been in every newspaper in Ireland but his reputation is untarnished.
I supposed page 21 was the best this scruff newspaper could do.
After all the cover was needed to print yet another photo of Ireland's vacuous vapid anti Catholic of a hairstyle of a Prime Minister Enda Kenny along with a splash piece claiming the German Chancellor holds him in high regard.
No room to trumpet the exoneration of Father Brennan.
No room to point out that sometimes thugs and scoundrels read the Irish Independent and decide there is money to be made accusing Catholic Priests of child abuse.
No room for the truth.
Best to hide it on page 21.
As for Enda Kenny.
There are three photos of the anti Catholic Irish Prime Minister in today's anti Catholic Irish Independent.
They are spread throughout the paper.
The first on the cover, the second accompanying an interior two page splash about Enda Kenny, the third on the letters page, in case we'd forgotten what he looked like.
Why does the Irish Independent print photos of anti Catholic Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny every day?
Here's why.
The Irish Independent admits to debts apporaching a billion dollards.
The real figure will be much much higher.
Prime Minister Enda Kenny has recently nationalised every bank in Ireland.
Since he's running the banks, Independent Newspapers has devised a strategy of every closer links with him.
The idea is, that with anti Catholic Prime Minister Enda Kenny in charge, the banks will never call in the billion dollar debt that bankrupt anti Catholic Independent Newspapers owes them.
Instead, we the people will pick up the tab.
We the people will keep career thieves like Tony O'Reilly and Denis O'Brien in BMW's for themselves, their wives, mistresses, sons, daughters and their cat Tiddles for the rest of their misbegotten lives.
It is time to put at stop to this.