The Heelers Diaries

the fantasy world of ireland's greatest living poet

My Photo
Name:
Location: Kilcullen (Phone 087 7790766), County Kildare, Ireland

Friday, November 18, 2016

from the heelers phone calls

The phone rang.
It was Yankee Joe.
"How do ya like being back in Ireland, Heelers?"
"Faygo it's like the end of the world. What the hell happened to this country? Did the Muslims nuke it with an unattractive women bomb? It's like a desert. After Boston this is insufferable. There are no good looking girls in  Ireland. It's unbelievable. I think they're actually trying to be unattractive. It's like... it's like... it's like a place with no good looking women in it. It's like a 1950's B movie, The Land That Good Looking Women Forgot. You know we made up the famine, right? We made it up because we had no good looking women and we wanted what you've got in Boston. Breughal should sue for copyright infringement. It's ----ing awful."

Thursday, November 17, 2016

no second fine gael

why should i blame them that they filled my country
with drug gangs or that they would of late
have taught to ignorant doctors most violent ways
particularly when it comes to unborn babies
or hurled the little anti depressants on the great
had they but humanity equal to their desire for cash
what could have made them peaceful with a christian tradition
when frivolous marxian hedonism led them to lower our borders to jihad trash
with an ideology of psychotic islam a kind
that is all too natural in an age like this
being barbarous and murderous and insane by turns
why what else could they have done
in abandoning the ten commandments habeas corpus and tort
was there another ireland for them to abort




***
(With apologies to WB Yeats)

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

the evil that men do


IN WHICH I POSTULATE COLLUSION BETWEEN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION IN FOSTERING A FICTIONAL NOTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN ORDER TO SELL ANTI DEPRESSANT DRUGS TO A GENERATION OF ADULTS AND CHILDREN THAT HAS NEVER NEEDED THEM AND IS BEING POISONED BY THEM

Pharmaceutical companies have propagated an utterly false understanding of mental pain.

They have falsely claimed to have established that anxiety, depression, manias and schizophrenic conditions are caused by imbalances in brain chemistry.

They have falsely claimed to have proven that their drugs improve outcomes for people experiencing these conditions.

They have falsely propagated the notion that the sufferings of life are biologically induced illnesses.

They have colonised and colluded with the medical profession to mislead people into believing that their mental pain was a chemical imbalance and that they could be drugged out of their sufferings.

In pursuit of ever higher revenues pharmaceutical companies and doctors have now started labelling children as mentally ill when the children are in any way difficult to control in school. This bogus model of illness deliberately conceals the fact that most such children are among experiencing disruptive influences in their upbringing which may include any or all of the following: living in homes where the parents are behaving badly; being exposed to drug use; being exposed to disruptive sexualised and aggressivised stimuli on television or other media; being exposed to sundry other cultural dysfunctions in our societies; being systematically bullied; being raised without God. The false compassion of our era means fidgety children get labelled mentally ill nfor life and dosed with Ridalin and other pharmaceutical company drug poisons while parents behaving disgracefully towards those children go absolutely unexamined.

The pharmaceutical companies have deliberately concealed the addictive nature of their anti depressant poisons and have perversely insisted that the withdrawal symptoms which patients show when they give up pharmaceutical drug poisons such as Zoloft, Prozac and their ilk, are evidence that the patients need the pharmaceutical drug poisons they have become addicted to.

Here is the news.

Before the anti depressant marketing scam of the past fifty years, people routinely recovered from schizophrenia, which by the way, is the most challenging of all the mental conditions being falsely represented by pharmaceutical companies as incurable.

Outcomes for adults and children with depression, or anxiety, or any form of mental pain (These are not illnesses. They are the dignity of a human being facing human suffering.) before the anti depressant con job was incepted were routinely better than they are now. People got better and stayed better.

The best evidence I would refer you regarding what I am asserting here, is very well summed up in Robert Whitaker's book Anatomy Of An Academic which bookshops will order for you. The Irish doctor Terry Lynch has also published significant contributions on the matter.

The behaviour of pharmaceutical companies and doctors in maliciously prescribing anti depressants for people who do not need them and are being damaged by them, is worse than the criminal behaviour of the pharmaceutical companies in prescribing thalidomide to pregnant women in the 1960's when they knew that thalidomide would violate and damage unborn children.

The behaviour of pharmaceutical companies and psychiatric professionals and doctors in concealing the mounting evidence that anti depressants are addictive and are poisoning a generation of people, is beyond criminality. It is evil.

The pharmaceutical companies have propagated the notion that they are too big to fail.

We should close them down.

All of them,

If we are willing to close them, we can close them.

They should have been closed for thalidomide.

This is worse than thalidomide.

Join me,


**********


Note well: If you are on these anti depressants and you decide I am correct in this matter, you must seek the support of family or friends or like minded people or genuinely humane doctors or priests or nuns, or God, or a mixture of the above or all of the above, in learning to live without these substances. You're in a fight now. For your life. You can do it.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

memo to policy makers at NASA re space exploration

Stop building telescopes which only show what your photo shop computer software tells them to show.
Instead, build space shuttles which excite all of us and make great things dreamable and possible.
Stop launching billion dollar probes to pointlessly crash into Mars. These probes like your silly orbital telescopes are an attempt to distract people from the fact that you haven't been building space shuttles.
Stop splurging billions of dollars on developing a manned mission to Mars before we've even begun to develop the technology and practices necessary to colonise another planet.
Instead, build an international settlement on earth's moon (involving Russia, China, Europe, the USA, and Africa) and what we learn building and running Moonbase will tell us whether a Mars trip may someday be feasible or desirable.
Through Moonbase we may actually develop the technology to terraform a planet, ie how to make it habitable for humans.
We will also learn far more genuine scientific stuff than you are at present pretending to learn through your photoshop telescopes.
We will also learn about ourselves.
Moonbase will be a useful end in itself, not just as our first colonisation of another solar system body, but as a human endeavour, as an adventure, and as an act of the imagination made real.
It might also make the trip to Mars survivable when it eventually does happen.

a sober reflection

I was wrong about Donald Trump's prospects for success in the American Presidential election and have no wish to diminish his victory.
You will forgive me a small niggling comment.
In 2010, a plane carrying the President of Poland crashed in Russia.
The plane also carried leading members of Poland's parliament and civil society, the veritable conscience of Poland who had seen off Russian communist rule, and were the standard bearers of ongoing Polish freedom and independence.
They were wiped out a stroke.
I believed at the time that the crash was a decapitation strike against Poland by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Following the crash Poland held an election.
The brother of the newly deceased President of Poland stood in the election and was improbably beaten by a pro Russian candidate.
I suggested at the time that Mr Putin's KGB had found a way to gerrymander elections, not with the old arrogance of the communist era where they declared unanimous victories for their proxies, but with more subtle and simpler computer software manipulations that gave a one, two or three percent win.
Four years later I commented on these matters to a Ukrainian acquaintance.
I told her that I thought the Putin administration had not only manipulated elections in Poland but also had somehow fixed Ukrainian elections in a similar way.
I added: "I think it may have happened. But it seems like too much of a conspiracy theory. I'd expect the truth to leak out somehow if Putin was really fixing elections in other countries outside Russia on that scale. And could he really do it? How would it be done? Where do you begin to rig another country's elections? How do you cover your tracks?"
She replied: "But James they were doing it for years. The apparatus for fixing our elections was established during the Soviet era. We had elections in Ukraine and Eastern Europe, even in those days. And the most despised communists won every time. That was when the KGB first developed their capability and methodology to create these results."
Her words struck most keenly upon my spirit.
Fast forward a few more years to just three weeks before the American Presidential election.
I am in Boston.
I am reading a State Department report on security threats which the new American President will face.
An obscure little paragraph notes:
"There is evidence that the Russian government has been manipulating election results in Europe for some time now."
And now we fast forward to today.
Donald Trump is President of the United States of America.
I wonder.
There are other factors we might note in postulating a fix.
I consider the Wikileaks website run by an individual styled Julian Assange to be a confirmed proxy for the Putin government.
Mr Assange indisputably engaged in selective leaking of purported email communications belonging to Hillary Clinton and her entourage in the months and weeks preceding the election.
Mr Assange clearly did this to damage Hillary Clinton's campaign. The only issue for us is to descide whether he did so on his own initiative or as part of a broad election fixing strategy being carried out by Vladimir Putin in order to destabilise America through a Trump win.
Several months before the vote, with Trump trailing dismally in the polls, Mr Trump began claiming that the election was being rigged to give Hillary Clinton victory.
He used the phrase: "The fix is in."
In the present postulation I would suggest that this looks like a classic bait and switch, ie a disruption strategy designed to confuse your opponent while your proxies and partisans engage in precisely the malfeasance you are accusing her of.
In my analysis election rigging does take place in the United States.
It is somewhat localised to particular regions but it is there.
I suggest that for the last fifty years at least, the preponderance of identifiable election fraud in America has been perpetrated by elements of the Democratic Party in tandem with elements of the Teamsters Union and the Cosa Nostra mafia gang.
In the present instance I am suggesting that the mafia's usual selective Democratic Party leanings may have been tempered somewhat by the fact that Mr Trump has had extensive multiple ongoing business contacts with Cosa Nostra in his Atlantic City, Las Vegas and New York property developments.
The thesis for a rigged election last week, involves the postulation of direct manipulation of the process by Vladimir Putin's resovietising government in Russia using computer hacking techniques to gerrymander several key results from several key States in favour of Donald Trump. Putin's proxies at Wikileaks and other such websites, would also have played a significant role in systematically weakening Hillary Clinton's support through the malicious and selective publication of her private email correspondence at important moments in the campaign, (We will keep an open mind as to whether Federal Bureau of Investigation director James Comey was acting in concert with this strategy when days before the election he announced a new enquiry into Hillary Clinton's email procedures.) Traditional Cosa Nostra mafia elements would also be discernible in the postulated conspiracy having dropped the Democratic Party for once, in favour of their own associate Mr Donald Trump. If I'm right, the mafia would have complemented Vladimir Putin's high tech computer hackers in gerrymandering target constituencies through the mafia's venerable tried and trusted long established practice of ballot stuffing.
I am concerned about Mr Trump's win.
Not for the reasons all you nice liberal atheistic abortionists against the bomb are concerned.
Not even for the conspiracy theory vote rigging reason I've adverted to above.
I'm concerned gentle travellers of the internet because I think I smell evil.